New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - feat: generalize tendsto_measure_cthickening from PseudoMetricSpace to PseudoEMetricSpace and add corresponding lemmas for open thickenings #6194
Closed
kkytola
wants to merge
6
commits into
master
from
kkytola/EMetricSpace_version_of_tendsto_measure_cthickening
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…introduced duplicates.
kkytola
added
WIP
Work in progress
t-topology
Topological spaces, uniform spaces, metric spaces, filters
t-measure-probability
Measure theory / Probability theory
labels
Jul 27, 2023
kkytola
changed the title
Kkytola/e metric space version of tendsto measure cthickening
feat: generalize tendsto_measure_cthickening from PseudoMetricSpace to PseudoEMetricSpace and add corresponding lemmas for open thickenings
Jul 27, 2023
kkytola
added
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
and removed
WIP
Work in progress
labels
Jul 27, 2023
2 tasks
Thanks! |
github-actions
bot
added
ready-to-merge
This PR has been sent to bors.
and removed
awaiting-review
The author would like community review of the PR
labels
Jul 31, 2023
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2023
…o PseudoEMetricSpace and add corresponding lemmas for open thickenings (#6194) This PR mainly makes the generalization so that `tendsto_measure_cthickening` and `tendsto_measure_cthickening_of_isClosed` assume `[PseudoEMetricSpace]` instead of `[PseudoMetricSpace]` (the proofs require no changes, but the generality seems valuable). Also the counterparts `tendsto_measure_thickening` and `tendsto_measure_thickening_of_isClosed` for open thickenings (instead of closed thickenings) are added.
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page. |
bors
bot
changed the title
feat: generalize tendsto_measure_cthickening from PseudoMetricSpace to PseudoEMetricSpace and add corresponding lemmas for open thickenings
[Merged by Bors] - feat: generalize tendsto_measure_cthickening from PseudoMetricSpace to PseudoEMetricSpace and add corresponding lemmas for open thickenings
Jul 31, 2023
bors
bot
deleted the
kkytola/EMetricSpace_version_of_tendsto_measure_cthickening
branch
July 31, 2023 08:58
semorrison
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 2, 2023
…o PseudoEMetricSpace and add corresponding lemmas for open thickenings (#6194) This PR mainly makes the generalization so that `tendsto_measure_cthickening` and `tendsto_measure_cthickening_of_isClosed` assume `[PseudoEMetricSpace]` instead of `[PseudoMetricSpace]` (the proofs require no changes, but the generality seems valuable). Also the counterparts `tendsto_measure_thickening` and `tendsto_measure_thickening_of_isClosed` for open thickenings (instead of closed thickenings) are added.
semorrison
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2023
…o PseudoEMetricSpace and add corresponding lemmas for open thickenings (#6194) This PR mainly makes the generalization so that `tendsto_measure_cthickening` and `tendsto_measure_cthickening_of_isClosed` assume `[PseudoEMetricSpace]` instead of `[PseudoMetricSpace]` (the proofs require no changes, but the generality seems valuable). Also the counterparts `tendsto_measure_thickening` and `tendsto_measure_thickening_of_isClosed` for open thickenings (instead of closed thickenings) are added.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge
This PR has been sent to bors.
t-measure-probability
Measure theory / Probability theory
t-topology
Topological spaces, uniform spaces, metric spaces, filters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR mainly makes the generalization so that
tendsto_measure_cthickening
andtendsto_measure_cthickening_of_isClosed
assume[PseudoEMetricSpace]
instead of[PseudoMetricSpace]
(the proofs require no changes, but the generality seems valuable).Also the counterparts
tendsto_measure_thickening
andtendsto_measure_thickening_of_isClosed
for open thickenings (instead of closed thickenings) are added.The diffs show almost exactly the same deletions and additions (modulo minor docstring edits). The actual difference is that the
section PseudoEMetricSpace
, where the results are moved, has thevariable
-line giving the more general assumption compared to thesection PseudoMetricSpace
, where the results were originally.