[Merged by Bors] - feat: allow differential objects with shifts in an AddMonoidWithOne #6246
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
semorrison
added
awaiting-review
semorrison
commented
Jul 30, 2023
semorrison
commented
Jul 30, 2023
TwoFX
reviewed
Jul 30, 2023
TwoFX
added
awaiting-author
semorrison
commented
Jul 30, 2023
semorrison
commented
Jul 30, 2023
Co-authored-by: Markus Himmel <markus@himmel-villmar.de>
semorrison
added
awaiting-review
TwoFX
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2023
|
bors d+ |
|
✌️ semorrison can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with |
github-actions
bot
added
delegated
and removed
awaiting-review
Co-authored-by: Markus Himmel <markus@himmel-villmar.de>
|
bors merge |
bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2023
…6246) What I was really hoping to do was show that ℕ-graded DGOs were the same as ℕ-graded chain complexes (we have the ℤ version), but this still seems awkward. If anyone would like to help with that, please let me know. I think this might be helpful in constructor tensor products of chain complexes with less suffering. Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page. |
bors
bot
changed the title
semorrison
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 2, 2023
…6246) What I was really hoping to do was show that ℕ-graded DGOs were the same as ℕ-graded chain complexes (we have the ℤ version), but this still seems awkward. If anyone would like to help with that, please let me know. I think this might be helpful in constructor tensor products of chain complexes with less suffering. Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
semorrison
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2023
…6246) What I was really hoping to do was show that ℕ-graded DGOs were the same as ℕ-graded chain complexes (we have the ℤ version), but this still seems awkward. If anyone would like to help with that, please let me know. I think this might be helpful in constructor tensor products of chain complexes with less suffering. Co-authored-by: Scott Morrison <scott.morrison@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What I was really hoping to do was show that ℕ-graded DGOs were the same as ℕ-graded chain complexes (we have the ℤ version), but this still seems awkward. If anyone would like to help with that, please let me know. I think this might be helpful in constructor tensor products of chain complexes with less suffering.