New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - chore: remove succ from Stirling #6280
Conversation
@PatrickMassot, I pushed a commit that replaces |
(Just a reminder that on the mathlib4 repo, if authors don't self-label with |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks 🎉
bors merge
The Stirling formula file was full of `n.succ` whose only purpose was to steer automatic coercion to a real number. Then formulas became unreadable and had to be restated in docstrings, leading to the error flagged [on zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/Typo.20in.20documentation.20of.20.60log_stirling_seq_formula.60/near/380554733) Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
Build failed (retrying...): |
The Stirling formula file was full of `n.succ` whose only purpose was to steer automatic coercion to a real number. Then formulas became unreadable and had to be restated in docstrings, leading to the error flagged [on zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/Typo.20in.20documentation.20of.20.60log_stirling_seq_formula.60/near/380554733) Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page. |
The Stirling formula file was full of `n.succ` whose only purpose was to steer automatic coercion to a real number. Then formulas became unreadable and had to be restated in docstrings, leading to the error flagged [on zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/Typo.20in.20documentation.20of.20.60log_stirling_seq_formula.60/near/380554733) Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
The Stirling formula file was full of `n.succ` whose only purpose was to steer automatic coercion to a real number. Then formulas became unreadable and had to be restated in docstrings, leading to the error flagged [on zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/Typo.20in.20documentation.20of.20.60log_stirling_seq_formula.60/near/380554733) Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
The Stirling formula file was full of
n.succ
whose only purpose was to steer automatic coercion to a real number. Then formulas became unreadable and had to be restated in docstrings, leading to the error flagged on zulip