Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore: remove succ from Stirling #6280

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

PatrickMassot
Copy link
Member

The Stirling formula file was full of n.succ whose only purpose was to steer automatic coercion to a real number. Then formulas became unreadable and had to be restated in docstrings, leading to the error flagged on zulip


Open in Gitpod

@eric-wieser
Copy link
Member

@PatrickMassot, I pushed a commit that replaces n + 1 with n since the statement is still true there and it makes it easier to read. Are you happy with that? Feel free to revert if not.

@semorrison
Copy link
Contributor

(Just a reminder that on the mathlib4 repo, if authors don't self-label with awaiting-review, PRs don't appear on the #queue and might never be noticed. :-)

@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. label Aug 27, 2023
@PatrickMassot PatrickMassot added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Aug 29, 2023
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot removed the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. label Aug 29, 2023
Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Sep 6, 2023
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
The Stirling formula file was full of `n.succ` whose only purpose was to steer automatic coercion to a real number. Then formulas became unreadable and had to be restated in docstrings, leading to the error flagged [on zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/Typo.20in.20documentation.20of.20.60log_stirling_seq_formula.60/near/380554733)



Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 6, 2023

Build failed (retrying...):

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2023
The Stirling formula file was full of `n.succ` whose only purpose was to steer automatic coercion to a real number. Then formulas became unreadable and had to be restated in docstrings, leading to the error flagged [on zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/Typo.20in.20documentation.20of.20.60log_stirling_seq_formula.60/near/380554733)



Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 6, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded!

The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon.

If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here.
For more help, visit the forum.

If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.

@bors bors bot changed the title chore: remove succ from Stirling [Merged by Bors] - chore: remove succ from Stirling Sep 6, 2023
@bors bors bot closed this Sep 6, 2023
@bors bors bot deleted the patrick_stirling branch September 6, 2023 13:06
ebab pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2023
The Stirling formula file was full of `n.succ` whose only purpose was to steer automatic coercion to a real number. Then formulas became unreadable and had to be restated in docstrings, leading to the error flagged [on zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/Typo.20in.20documentation.20of.20.60log_stirling_seq_formula.60/near/380554733)



Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
kodyvajjha pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2023
The Stirling formula file was full of `n.succ` whose only purpose was to steer automatic coercion to a real number. Then formulas became unreadable and had to be restated in docstrings, leading to the error flagged [on zulip](https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113488-general/topic/Typo.20in.20documentation.20of.20.60log_stirling_seq_formula.60/near/380554733)



Co-authored-by: Eric Wieser <wieser.eric@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants