Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat: explicit volume computations in NumberTheory.NumberField.CanonicalEmbedding #6886

Closed
wants to merge 68 commits into from

Conversation

xroblot
Copy link
Collaborator

@xroblot xroblot commented Aug 30, 2023

We compute the values of the volumes used in CanonicalEmbedding. In particular, we prove that

volume (fundamentalDomain (latticeBasis K)) =
       (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ^ (NrComplexPlaces K) * NNReal.sqrt ‖discr K‖₊

This will be useful later on to prove Hermite and Hermite-Minkowski theorems.


Open in Gitpod

@xroblot xroblot added WIP Work in progress t-number-theory Number theory (also use t-algebra or t-analysis to specialize) labels Aug 31, 2023
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added the blocked-by-other-PR This PR depends on another PR to Mathlib label Aug 31, 2023
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. label Sep 1, 2023
@xroblot xroblot added awaiting-review and removed WIP Work in progress labels Oct 27, 2023
@xroblot xroblot added WIP Work in progress and removed awaiting-review labels Nov 3, 2023
@xroblot xroblot added awaiting-review awaiting-CI and removed WIP Work in progress labels Nov 3, 2023
Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One more comment...
But the PR is now looking good to me.

I'm happy with merging it as is, if you would rather take care of my comment at a different moment. Or if you think it's not a good idea.

bors d+

Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/Discriminant.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

bors bot commented Nov 3, 2023

✌️ xroblot can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with bors r+. More detailed instructions are available here.

@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. label Nov 3, 2023
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot removed the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. label Nov 4, 2023
@xroblot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

xroblot commented Nov 4, 2023

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2023
…calEmbedding (#6886)

We compute the values of the volumes used in `CanonicalEmbedding`. In particular, we prove that
```lean
volume (fundamentalDomain (latticeBasis K)) =
       (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ^ (NrComplexPlaces K) * NNReal.sqrt ‖discr K‖₊
```

This will be useful later on to prove Hermite and Hermite-Minkowski theorems.
Copy link

bors bot commented Nov 4, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded!

The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon.

If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here.
For more help, visit the forum.

If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.

@bors bors bot changed the title feat: explicit volume computations in NumberTheory.NumberField.CanonicalEmbedding [Merged by Bors] - feat: explicit volume computations in NumberTheory.NumberField.CanonicalEmbedding Nov 4, 2023
@bors bors bot closed this Nov 4, 2023
@bors bors bot deleted the xfr_volume-computations branch November 4, 2023 10:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
delegated t-number-theory Number theory (also use t-algebra or t-analysis to specialize)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants