Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - fix: add missing DecidableEq arguments #7702

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

eric-wieser
Copy link
Member

@eric-wieser eric-wieser commented Oct 16, 2023

These make the lemmas strictly more (syntactically) general.

As usual, the way to find these is to remove open Classical and fix what breaks.
Usually this means adding classical to the start of the proof, but there are lots of weird term-mode proofs here for which adding a more surgical letI := Classical.decEq is easier.


Open in Gitpod

These make the lemmas strictly more (syntactically) general.

As usual, the way to find these is to remove `open Classical` and fix what breaks.
@eric-wieser eric-wieser added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR awaiting-CI t-algebra Algebra (groups, rings, fields etc) labels Oct 16, 2023
@semorrison
Copy link
Contributor

bors d+

@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Oct 16, 2023

✌️ eric-wieser can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with bors r+. More detailed instructions are available here.

@github-actions github-actions bot added delegated and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR awaiting-CI labels Oct 16, 2023
@eric-wieser
Copy link
Member Author

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. label Oct 16, 2023
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2023
These make the lemmas strictly more (syntactically) general.

As usual, the way to find these is to remove `open Classical` and fix what breaks.
Usually this means adding `classical` to the start of the proof, but there are lots of weird term-mode proofs here for which adding a more surgical `letI := Classical.decEq` is easier.
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Oct 16, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded!

The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon.

If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here.
For more help, visit the forum.

If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.

@bors bors bot changed the title fix: add missing DecidableEq arguments [Merged by Bors] - fix: add missing DecidableEq arguments Oct 16, 2023
@bors bors bot closed this Oct 16, 2023
@bors bors bot deleted the eric-wieser/poly-deriv-decide branch October 16, 2023 09:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
delegated ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. t-algebra Algebra (groups, rings, fields etc)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants