-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 234
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Merged by Bors] - refactor(CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Transport): flip the direction of μIso
and εIso
#7922
Conversation
This PR/issue depends on: |
maintainer merge |
🚀 Pull request has been placed on the maintainer queue by joelriou. |
Thanks! bors merge |
…Iso` and `εIso` (#7922) Reversing these makes the API closer to that of `CategoryTheory.LaxMonoidalFunctor`, and doesn't seem to have much impact on proof difficulty. This also golfs a proof rather than attempting to fix the old one. Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <joel.riou@universite-paris-saclay.fr>
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded! The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon. If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here. If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page. |
μIso
and εIso
μIso
and εIso
…Iso` and `εIso` (#7922) Reversing these makes the API closer to that of `CategoryTheory.LaxMonoidalFunctor`, and doesn't seem to have much impact on proof difficulty. This also golfs a proof rather than attempting to fix the old one. Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <joel.riou@universite-paris-saclay.fr>
Reversing these makes the API closer to that of
CategoryTheory.LaxMonoidalFunctor
, and doesn't seem to have much impact on proof difficulty.This also golfs a proof rather than attempting to fix the old one.