Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(Data/ZMod/Basic): add inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one #9140

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

kbuzzard
Copy link
Member


This came up on the Xena Discord. There are I guess 3 other variants of this -- not sure which ones we want? Thought I'd start with this and find out what others think.

Open in Gitpod

@kbuzzard kbuzzard added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Dec 18, 2023
Co-authored-by: Yaël Dillies <yael.dillies@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Dec 26, 2023
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2023
Co-authored-by: Johan Commelin <johan@commelin.net>
@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Dec 26, 2023

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title feat(Data/ZMod/Basic): add inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one [Merged by Bors] - feat(Data/ZMod/Basic): add inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one Dec 26, 2023
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Dec 26, 2023
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the kbuzzard-inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one branch December 26, 2023 23:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants