Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore: Rename rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg to rpow_nonneg #9518

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

YaelDillies
Copy link
Collaborator

This better matches other lemma names.

From LeanAPAP


Open in Gitpod

This better matches other lemma names.

From LeanAPAP
@YaelDillies YaelDillies added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR t-analysis Analysis (normed *, calculus) labels Jan 7, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jan 8, 2024
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2024
This better matches other lemma names.

From LeanAPAP
@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Jan 8, 2024

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title chore: Rename rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg to rpow_nonneg [Merged by Bors] - chore: Rename rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg to rpow_nonneg Jan 8, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Jan 8, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the rpow_nonneg branch January 8, 2024 12:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. t-analysis Analysis (normed *, calculus)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants