Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore: Rearrange arguments to Nat.multinomial_insert #9562

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

YaelDillies
Copy link
Collaborator

and a few other multinomial lemmas


Open in Gitpod

@YaelDillies YaelDillies added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. labels Jan 8, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Jan 9, 2024
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2024
and a few other `multinomial` lemmas
@mathlib-bors
Copy link

mathlib-bors bot commented Jan 9, 2024

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title chore: Rearrange arguments to Nat.multinomial_insert [Merged by Bors] - chore: Rearrange arguments to Nat.multinomial_insert Jan 9, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Jan 9, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the multinomial_insert branch January 9, 2024 09:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
easy < 20s of review time. See the lifecycle page for guidelines. ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants