Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(Counterexamples/CliffordAlgebra_not_injective): Some quadratic forms cannot be constructed from bilinear forms #9670

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

eric-wieser
Copy link
Member

Turns out that this follows trivially from the previous counterexample.

Perhaps there's a slicker proof that doesn't go via Clifford algebras at all, but it seemed worth recording this one anyway.


Open in Gitpod

…orms cannot be constructed from bilinear forms
@eric-wieser eric-wieser added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR awaiting-CI t-algebra Algebra (groups, rings, fields etc) labels Jan 11, 2024
eric-wieser and others added 2 commits January 11, 2024 23:24
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@mcdoll
Copy link
Member

mcdoll commented Feb 10, 2024

It shouldn't be too hard to use LinearMap.toQuadraticForm instead, right?

@@ -260,6 +264,16 @@ is not injective, as it sends the non-zero `α * β * γ` to zero. -/
theorem algebraMap_not_injective : ¬Function.Injective (algebraMap K <| CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
fun h => αβγ_ne_zero <| h <| by rw [algebraMap_αβγ_eq_zero, RingHom.map_zero]

/-- Bonus counterexample: `Q` is a quadratic form that has no bilinear form. -/
theorem Q_not_in_range_toQuadraticForm : Q ∉ Set.range BilinForm.toQuadraticForm := by
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems there is a positive result: if a quadratic form is induced by a bilinear form, then the algebraMap to the clifford algebra is injective.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct; this is in fact a consequence of a (trivial) generalization of equivExterior; for now, that definition assumes Invertible (2 : R) instead of IsInducedByBilinear Q, as the latter does not exist as a typeclass.

Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Feb 20, 2024
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
…orms cannot be constructed from bilinear forms (#9670)

Turns out that this follows trivially from the previous counterexample.

Perhaps there's a slicker proof that doesn't go via Clifford algebras at all, but it seemed worth recording this one anyway.
@mathlib-bors
Copy link

mathlib-bors bot commented Feb 20, 2024

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title feat(Counterexamples/CliffordAlgebra_not_injective): Some quadratic forms cannot be constructed from bilinear forms [Merged by Bors] - feat(Counterexamples/CliffordAlgebra_not_injective): Some quadratic forms cannot be constructed from bilinear forms Feb 20, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Feb 20, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the eric-wieser/bonus-counterexample branch February 20, 2024 15:53
thorimur pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2024
…orms cannot be constructed from bilinear forms (#9670)

Turns out that this follows trivially from the previous counterexample.

Perhaps there's a slicker proof that doesn't go via Clifford algebras at all, but it seemed worth recording this one anyway.
thorimur pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
…orms cannot be constructed from bilinear forms (#9670)

Turns out that this follows trivially from the previous counterexample.

Perhaps there's a slicker proof that doesn't go via Clifford algebras at all, but it seemed worth recording this one anyway.
riccardobrasca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
…orms cannot be constructed from bilinear forms (#9670)

Turns out that this follows trivially from the previous counterexample.

Perhaps there's a slicker proof that doesn't go via Clifford algebras at all, but it seemed worth recording this one anyway.
dagurtomas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2024
…orms cannot be constructed from bilinear forms (#9670)

Turns out that this follows trivially from the previous counterexample.

Perhaps there's a slicker proof that doesn't go via Clifford algebras at all, but it seemed worth recording this one anyway.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. t-algebra Algebra (groups, rings, fields etc)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants