-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Incorporate performance improvements to restoring a wallet #16
Comments
hstove
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 25, 2020
* refactor: Add `<Screen />` component from @blockstack/app * refactor: Move screens into same directory * fix: Styling issues introduced with refactor * WIP: refactor: ScreenActions * feat: Bump package version * fix: Inacessible close modal button
alter-eggo
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 3, 2024
alter-eggo
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 3, 2024
alter-eggo
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 3, 2024
alter-eggo
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 3, 2024
alter-eggo
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 6, 2024
alter-eggo
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 6, 2024
Merged
kyranjamie
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 14, 2024
## [6.39.0](v6.38.0...v6.39.0) (2024-05-14) ### Features * hide asset list unsupported tokens in accordion, closes [#16](#16) ([f37bb1b](f37bb1b)) ### Bug Fixes * add schema validation for stamps ([7a89337](7a89337)) * change default to pulling 10 keys ([b5c9c79](b5c9c79)) * compliance checks reenabled ([d0c17ec](d0c17ec)) * constant retrying of metadata ([540c349](540c349)) * double stacks asset in ledger mode ([5d9895f](5d9895f)) * remove ledger add more keys route, ref [#4786](#4786) ([45c9968](45c9968)) * use nakamoto testnet link when network is set to nakamoto testnet ([e522113](e522113)) ### Internal * input calc helper methods ([16a9e6e](16a9e6e)) * post-release merge back ([9caef96](9caef96)) * remove multiple recipients components ([8f83bcc](8f83bcc))
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
@zone117x, you mentioned in SF that you have some performance enhancements to some of our keychain-related code. This is pretty necessary, as the current process is very slow, and is only non-blocking because I've moved it into a Web Worker. Can you share more information about exactly the changes you've found, and how I can incorporate it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: