Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

more examples of problematic galaxy modeling #454

Closed
moustakas opened this issue Oct 27, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

more examples of problematic galaxy modeling #454

moustakas opened this issue Oct 27, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@moustakas
Copy link
Contributor

Problem areas identified by Maayane Soumagnac (working with Peter Nugent).

Below are a few examples we found of problems with the Tractor modelling. This
is not a complete list, we found these case serendipitously by looking at a few 
hundred cases.

    Issues with modeling big galaxies (the issue is most visible when ticking the 
"DR8 models" box in the Legacy Survey viewer. Tractor basically models a big 
galaxy with several smaller galaxies):
        277.682741 +42.362312
        266.472504 +31.710562
        206.727482 +32.442861
        284.989742 +72.267328
        357.492463 +7.073495
        273.976453 +44.696486
        328.652038 +18.115517
    Issues with star-galaxy classification (galaxies appearing in DR8 as "PSF" 
objects whereas they are galaxies)
        344.845665 +8.751283
        339.337937 +22.379571
@moustakas
Copy link
Contributor Author

From Peter:

Source RA,Dec = 339.3381, 22.3799
Source type: P
Mags: g=18.06, r=17.66, z=17.41
Brick: 3393p225, Objid: 116
Number of exposures: g=3, r=3, z=4
---------
Source RA,Dec = 277.6812, 42.3647
Source type: E
Mags: g=20.90, r=19.87, z=19.42
Brick: 2777p422, Objid: 6392
Number of exposures: g=3, r=3, z=3

or

Source RA,Dec = 277.6808, 42.3647
Source type: E
Mags: g=17.55, r=17.04, z=16.64
Brick: 2777p422, Objid: 6386
Number of exposures: g=3, r=3, z=3

---------

Source RA,Dec = 266.4726, 31.7109
Source type: P
Mags: g=18.44, r=17.23, z=16.30
Brick: 2663p317, Objid: 1808
Number of exposures: g=3, r=3, z=3

or

Source RA,Dec = 266.4719, 31.7104
Source type: E
Mags: g=20.31, r=19.14, z=18.30
Brick: 2663p317, Objid: 1768
Number of exposures: g=3, r=3, z=3

---------
Source RA,Dec = 206.7238, 32.4438
Source type: D
Mags: g=18.24, r=17.52, z=16.93
Brick: 2067p325, Objid: 838
Number of exposures: g=3, r=3, z=3

or

Source RA,Dec = 206.7259, 32.4424
Source type: E
Mags: g=20.95, r=20.43, z=20.23
Brick: 2067p325, Objid: 842
Number of exposures: g=3, r=3, z=3

or

Source RA,Dec = 206.7285, 32.4435
Source type: E
Mags: g=21.32, r=20.77, z=20.37
Brick: 2067p325, Objid: 841
Number of exposures: g=3, r=3, z=3
---------

Source RA,Dec = 284.9792, 72.2657
Source type: E
Mags: g=16.73, r=16.27, z=15.97
Brick: 2846p722, Objid: 2098
Number of exposures: g=3, r=2, z=4

and 8 others around it.
---------
Source RA,Dec = 357.4923, 7.0722
Source type: E
Mags: g=18.94, r=18.50, z=18.23
Brick: 3576p070, Objid: 3617
Number of exposures: g=4, r=3, z=3

2 others around it

---------
Source RA,Dec = 273.9745, 44.6951
Source type: E
Mags: g=16.25, r=15.64, z=15.21
Brick: 2738p447, Objid: 1538
Number of exposures: g=5, r=5, z=2
---------
Source RA,Dec = 328.6498, 18.1147
Source type: E
Mags: g=20.53, r=19.51, z=18.25
Brick: 3286p180, Objid: 5881
Number of exposures: g=4, r=4, z=5

and 4 others around it
---------
Source RA,Dec = 344.8456, 8.7513
Source type: P
Mags: g=17.53, r=16.97, z=16.91
Brick: 3449p087, Objid: 2442
Number of exposures: g=3, r=3, z=3

@moustakas
Copy link
Contributor Author

I spot-checked several of these and I don't think there are any specific action items. Galaxies that are large enough to be in the LSLGA (see #536 and #513) will get pre-burned and will have non-parametric ellipse-fitting quantities measured.

Galaxies too small to be in the LSLGA but large enough to have their internal / spiral structure will get shredded, but that's a known issue that comes along with using a small number of smooth, axisymmetric parametric galaxy models in Tractor.

More complex galaxy modeling will need to be done outside of the scope of the main data releases.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant