-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for OverloadedStringConcat and bug fixes #3024
Conversation
@@ -883,6 +917,7 @@ RUN(NAME string_26 LABELS gfortran llvm fortran) | |||
RUN(NAME string_27 LABELS gfortran llvm) | |||
RUN(NAME string_28 LABELS gfortran llvm) | |||
RUN(NAME string_29 LABELS gfortran llvm) | |||
COMPILE(NAME string_30 COMPILERS gfortran lfortran) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This adds a complication to this cmake that we now have to maintain and ensure it actually works.
If we are just checking that llvm can be generated, why not add an llvm
test or something similar?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are not checking LLVM generation with this test. Just -c
option (which generates mod
file).
#2866