Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for OverloadedStringConcat and bug fixes #3024

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Jan 2, 2024

Conversation

czgdp1807
Copy link
Member

@czgdp1807 czgdp1807 commented Jan 1, 2024

@czgdp1807 czgdp1807 marked this pull request as ready for review January 2, 2024 10:16
@czgdp1807 czgdp1807 added the stdlib Issues related to compiling fortran-lang/stdlib label Jan 2, 2024
@@ -883,6 +917,7 @@ RUN(NAME string_26 LABELS gfortran llvm fortran)
RUN(NAME string_27 LABELS gfortran llvm)
RUN(NAME string_28 LABELS gfortran llvm)
RUN(NAME string_29 LABELS gfortran llvm)
COMPILE(NAME string_30 COMPILERS gfortran lfortran)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This adds a complication to this cmake that we now have to maintain and ensure it actually works.

If we are just checking that llvm can be generated, why not add an llvm test or something similar?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are not checking LLVM generation with this test. Just -c option (which generates mod file).

@czgdp1807 czgdp1807 merged commit bcfdb73 into lfortran:main Jan 2, 2024
21 checks passed
@czgdp1807 czgdp1807 deleted the concat_overload branch January 2, 2024 18:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stdlib Issues related to compiling fortran-lang/stdlib
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants