Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add exodus forbind files created during in-tree build to .gitignore #214

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2014

Conversation

bwspenc
Copy link
Contributor

@bwspenc bwspenc commented Mar 4, 2014

When I do an in-tree build of libmesh, I get a bunch of files that git doesn't know about:
contrib/exodusii/5.22b/exodus/forbind/src/.deps/
contrib/exodusii/5.22b/exodus/forbind/src/.dirstamp
contrib/exodusii/5.22b/exodus/forbind/src/libdbg_la-addrwrap.lo
contrib/exodusii/5.22b/exodus/forbind/src/libdbg_la-exo_jack.lo
contrib/exodusii/5.22b/exodus/forbind/src/liboprof_la-addrwrap.lo
contrib/exodusii/5.22b/exodus/forbind/src/liboprof_la-exo_jack.lo
contrib/exodusii/5.22b/exodus/forbind/src/libopt_la-addrwrap.lo
contrib/exodusii/5.22b/exodus/forbind/src/libopt_la-exo_jack.lo
This minor commit just adds a few entries to the .gitignore file in that directory. The c equivalents of those are already there.

@moosebuild
Copy link

A build job for a259f42 from recipe libmesh is waiting for a developer to activate it here: https://www.moosebuild.com/view_job/146

@moosebuild
Copy link

Results of testing a259f42 using libmesh recipe:

Passed on: linux

View the results here: https://www.moosebuild.com/view_job/146

jwpeterson added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2014
Add exodus forbind files created during in-tree build to .gitignore
@jwpeterson jwpeterson merged commit 799c352 into libMesh:master Mar 4, 2014
@jwpeterson
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@bwspenc bwspenc deleted the exodus_gitignore branch March 4, 2014 20:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants