Changed subfieldmark back to subfieldcode

marc/benchmarks/benchmarkschema

@@ -1,23 +1,12 @@
-CREATE TABLE marc_0XX_tag_table (
-		bibcode bigint(20) NOT NULL default '0',
-		tagnumber char(3) NOT NULL default '',
-		tagorder tinyint(4) NOT NULL default '0',
-		tagvalue varchar(255) default NULL,
-		valuebloblink bigint(20) default NULL,
-		PRIMARY KEY  (bibcode,tagnumber,tagorder)
-		) TYPE=MyISAM;
-
-CREATE TABLE marc_2XX_subfield_table (
+CREATE TABLE marc_subfield_table (
 		subfieldid bigint(20) unsigned NOT NULL auto_increment,
 		tagid bigint(20) NOT NULL default '0',
 		tag char(3) NOT NULL default '',
 		bibid bigint(20) NOT NULL default '0',
 		subfieldorder tinyint(4) NOT NULL default '0',
-		subfieldcode char(1) NOT NULL default '',
+		subfieldmark char(1) NOT NULL default '',
 		subfieldvalue varchar(255) default NULL,
 		valuebloblink bigint(20) default NULL,
 		PRIMARY KEY (subfieldid),
-		KEY (bibid,tagid,tag,subfieldcode),
-		KEY (bibid,tag,subfieldcode,subfieldvalue)
+		KEY (bibid,tagid,tag,subfieldmark),
 		) TYPE=MyISAM;
-

marc/marcschema.sql

@@ -18,11 +18,11 @@ CREATE TABLE marc_subfield_table (
 		tag char(3) NOT NULL default '',
 		bibid bigint(20) NOT NULL default '0',
 		subfieldorder tinyint(4) NOT NULL default '0',
-		subfieldmark char(1) NOT NULL default '',
+		subfieldcode char(1) NOT NULL default '',
 		subfieldvalue varchar(255) default NULL,
 		valuebloblink bigint(20) default NULL,
 		PRIMARY KEY (subfieldid),
-		KEY (bibid,tagid,tag,subfieldmark),
+		KEY (bibid,tagid,tag,subfieldcode),
 		) TYPE=MyISAM;
 
 # marc_blob_tag containts tag longer than 255 car.

marc/perlmarcstructure

@@ -37,6 +37,11 @@ index to the structure to aid these lookups.
 $record->{index}->{110}->{tags}=\(3,4)   <-- array ref shows that tags 3 and 4
 					     are 110 tags
 
+Need a similar index for subfields.... I'm not sure if this is any simpler than
+just looping through the tags every time.  :)
+
+I think looping is the way to go...
+
 This still needs more work.  This will also require an API for accessing or
 modifying this structure, as it is non-trivial to parse the data.  I'm also
 starting to wonder how difficult it is going to be to develop templates using