-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for new Extreme VSP/VOSS models #12273
Conversation
Adding support for some legacy VSP models and new VSP4900 and 5520 series. All of the models use the same kernel so no need to add snmpsim data for these. They all use the same OID for fans, power supplies, cpu, memory, vlans and etc... There is already many VSP models in the snmpsim. I do not have access to test all these models but I have verified oids from manufacture. |
Ok, I looked at the reported stats and: Why are we calling out specific models? (which requires constant updates) |
Ok, how about this for generic style detection? boss discovery:
-
sysObjectID:
- .1.3.6.1.4.1.45.
- .1.3.6.1.4.1.2272.
sysDescr:
- 'Ethernet Switch'
- 'Ethernet Routing Switch'
- 'ERS'
- 'Virtual Services Platform 7024XLS'
- 'Virtual Services Platform 7024XT' voss discovery:
-
sysObjectID:
- .1.3.6.1.4.1.2272. # everything not caught by boss OS
-
sysObjectID:
- .1.3.6.1.4.1.1916.2.
sysDescr:
- VSP
- VOSS
- XA1440
- XA1480 xos discovery:
-
sysObjectID:
- .1.3.6.1.4.1.1916.2. # everything not caught by voss OS |
Let me test this in my lab. :-) This is a pain because they moved oid on voss from one prefix to the next. I understand what you are saying. Let me do some testing. |
I have have cleaned up the yaml file and took your recommendation. I did testing and devices were discovering properly. For BOSS and VOSS. |
This should be complete. I deleted several BOSS, VOSS and EXOS in my lab and added back. Discovery of the OS was correct for each platform. Thank you Murrant for the logic. This will allow future VSP to work without making special exceptions. |
This pull request has been mentioned on LibreNMS Community. There might be relevant details there: https://community.librenms.org/t/v1-69-release-changelog-november-2020/14124/1 |
Please give a short description what your pull request is for
DO NOT DELETE THE UNDERLYING TEXT
Please note
Testers
If you would like to test this pull request then please run:
./scripts/github-apply <pr_id>
, i.e./scripts/github-apply 5926
After you are done testing, you can remove the changes with
./scripts/github-remove
. If there are schema changes, you can ask on discord how to revert.