Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove language specific msg_hash_xx.c files #15218

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2023

Conversation

zoltanvb
Copy link
Contributor

Description

After PR #14821 , the contents of msg_hash_xx.c files are present in the normal translation workflow. Since that time, almost all languages have either caught up on Crowdin, or are still on such low level of translation completeness, that removing these entries does not harm usability.

Only Chinese Simplified and Portuguese Brazilian languages remain in separate files, as they may still be considered an improvement over Crowdin status.

See also commit 568ffac.

After PR libretro#14821 , the contents of msg_hash_xx.c files are present
in the normal translation workflow. Since that time, almost all
languages have either caught up on Crowdin, or are still on such
low level of translation completeness, that removing these entries
does not harm usability.

Only Chinese Simplified and Portuguese Brazilian languages remain
in separate files, as they may still be considered an improvement
over Crowdin status.

See also commit 568ffac.
@LibretroAdmin LibretroAdmin merged commit 80296a6 into libretro:master Apr 23, 2023
AnthonySibl added a commit to AnthonySibl/RetroArch that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2023
@zoltanvb zoltanvb deleted the msg_hash_xx_c_removal branch May 7, 2023 06:35
zoltanvb added a commit to zoltanvb/libretro-docs that referenced this pull request May 21, 2023
After libretro/RetroArch#15218, separate
msg_hash_xx.c files are no longer needed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants