Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mention explicitly that some GBA cores do not support "SaveRAM Autosave Interval" setting #927

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 9, 2024

Conversation

nighto
Copy link
Contributor

@nighto nighto commented Mar 6, 2024

In order to prevent loss of data when using internal saving and exiting RetroArch in a non-graceful way, as addressed on libretro/RetroArch#16323 and many other times.

@hizzlekizzle
Copy link
Contributor

Since the SRAM autosave feature is a RetroArch feature, I would normally suggest that it's not really appropriate for the libretro docs pages beyond the checkmark (or lack thereof) in the libretro features section. That is, it doesn't apply to any other libretro frontends, which might handle saving in a different way without using the libretro save interface.

However, I do know this is a significant problem for people, so I'm not against having some sort of additional notice. I would prefer if it appeared down with the libretro features, though, rather than up at the main explanation of the core.

@nighto
Copy link
Contributor Author

nighto commented Mar 7, 2024

No problem, I can move the content down.

Move SRAM Autosave Interval information to the table below
Move SaveRAM Autosave Interval down
explain that it only affects if used from within RetroArch
adds explicit mention to SaveRAM Autosave Interval support
adds SaveRAM Autosave Interval
Adds SaveRAM Autosave Interval
@nighto
Copy link
Contributor Author

nighto commented Mar 7, 2024

Done; also added the line to the cores that do support it.

@LibretroAdmin LibretroAdmin merged commit 75f3cf8 into libretro:master Mar 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants