Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Atomic integer functions #113

Closed
SDLBugzilla opened this issue Feb 10, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

Atomic integer functions #113

SDLBugzilla opened this issue Feb 10, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@SDLBugzilla
Copy link
Collaborator

SDLBugzilla commented Feb 10, 2021

This bug report was migrated from our old Bugzilla tracker.

These attachments are available in the static archive:

Reported in version: HG 2.0
Reported for operating system, platform: All, All

Comments on the original bug report:

On 2008-11-26 08:06:10 +0000, wrote:

Over a year ago atomic integer functions were discussed and agreed would be a nice addition to 1.3. I threw together a patch which covered the main platforms I had some access to at the time.

http://landofbile.com/software/SDL_atomic.patch

I've not the time to check to see if it will apply cleanly currently. In the least the code can be used as a base.

On 2009-02-16 21:23:33 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote:

Thanks! I'm just waiting on a code release so I can include this in SDL 1.3.

On 2009-07-14 08:46:20 +0000, wrote:

Created attachment 339
initial SDL_atomic patch

The original link is broken. Here's an attachment for historical purposes.

On 2009-10-10 12:39:56 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote:

Bob has implemented the atomic operations API. Bob, can you review this patch and see if there's anything here that benefits us?

Thanks!

On 2009-10-12 11:26:08 +0000, Sam Lantinga wrote:

Bob actually used this as the basis for his work. Thanks!

@SDLBugzilla SDLBugzilla added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant