-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
inaccuracies, mistakes, blunders based on winning chances #4705
Comments
Going from +100 cp to -200 cp is usually a huge mistake, but going from -600 to -900 hardly changes anything. Therefore the "Learn from your mistakes" feature uses a difference in "winning chances" (as opposed to difference in raw centipawns) to indentify mistakes. The formulas are here: https://github.com/ornicar/lila/blob/master/ui/ceval/src/winningChances.ts Meanwhile server side analysis still uses raw centipawn differences: That could be improved ... |
@niklasf following up on this |
* master: Fix the animation of the arrow in the sub-ratings list update stockfish.wasm (v0.5.10: emcc 1.38.41, follow official sf) fix typo consistent inaccurary threshold for retro tweak blunder threshold privatized method for cp to winning chance. Changed blunder delta to .5 server analysis determines judgements based on winning chances resolves #4705
also for server side analysis
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: