os/store_test: Fixes dump_mismatch_bl to avoid assert on lengths mism… #15
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We reference count which parts of the blob are used (by lextents), but currently we only release our space back to the system when all references go away. That is a problem if the blob is large (say, 4MB), and we, say, truncate off most (but not all) of it. Unfortunately, we can't simply deallocate anything that doesn't have a reference, because the logical refs are on byte boundaries, and allocation happens in larger units (min_alloc_size). A one byte logical punch_hole might be responsible for the release of a larger block of storage. To resolve this, we keep track of which portions of the blob have been released by poisoning the offset in the extents vector. We expect that this vector will be almost always short, so we do not bother with a indexed structure, since iterating a blob offset to determine if it is still allocated is likely faster. Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
We're only worried about direct writes and wal overwrites; the other write paths are to freshly allocated blobs. Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
Use the blob put_ref helper so that we can deallocate blobs partially (instead of always waiting until they are completely unused). Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
We have this in the class, now. Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
…+ adds simplified test case to highlight an issue for append to existing blob Signed-off-by: Igor Fedotov <ifedotov@mirantis.com>
The buffer cache will cover this in a much more general way. Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
BitmapFreelistManager doesn't like overlapping allocated+released sets when the debug option is enabled, because it does a read to verify the op is valid and that may not have been applied to the kv store yet. This makes bluestore ObjectStore/StoreTest.SimpleCloneTest/2 pass with bluestore_clone_cow = false and bluestore_freelist_type = bitmap. Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
…atch. Starts using it for BufferCacheTest Signed-off-by: Igor Fedotov <ifedotov@mirantis.com>
liewegas
force-pushed
the
wip-bluestore-write
branch
2 times, most recently
from
292d9fc
to
6b799e8
Compare
|
manually cherry-picked into wip-bluestore-comp |
liewegas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 6, 2018
When displaying values with their unit a blank space must be shown between them, see #15 at https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/checklist.html. Signed-off-by: Volker Theile <vtheile@suse.com>
liewegas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2019
CID 172143 (#15 of 15): Branch past initialization (PW.BRANCH_PAST_INITIALIZATION) 1. branch_past_initialization: 2. name_at_decl_position: variable "oid" (declared at line 220) 3. name_at_decl_position: variable "exkeys" (declared at line 241) 4. name_at_decl_position: variable "exvals" (declared at line 242) 5. name_at_decl_position: variable "safe" (declared at line 278) Signed-off-by: songweibin <song.weibin@zte.com.cn>
liewegas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2020
Accordingly to cppreference.com [1]: "If multiple threads of execution access the same std::shared_ptr object without synchronization and any of those accesses uses a non-const member function of shared_ptr then a data race will occur (...)" [1]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr/atomic One of the coredumps showed the `shared_ptr`-typed `OSD::osdmap` with healthy looking content but damaged control block: ``` [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f7dcaf73700 (LWP 205295))] (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () #1 0x0000559c97675b27 in std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #3 0x0000559c975ef8aa in std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_count (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 #4 std::__shared_ptr<OSDMap const, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 #5 std::shared_ptr<OSDMap const>::~shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr.h:103 #6 OSD::create_context (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9053 #7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 #8 0x0000559c97886db6 in ceph::osd::scheduler::PGPeeringItem::run (this=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, sdata=<optimized out>, pg=..., handle=...) at /usr/include/c++/8/ext/atomicity.h:96 #9 0x0000559c9764862f in ceph::osd::scheduler::OpSchedulerItem::run (handle=..., pg=..., sdata=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, this=0x7f7dcaf703f0) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/unique_ptr.h:342 #10 OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process (this=<optimized out>, thread_index=<optimized out>, hb=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:10677 #11 0x0000559c97c76094 in ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker (this=0x559ca22aca28, thread_index=14) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.cc:311 #12 0x0000559c97c78cf4 in ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.h:706 #13 0x00007f7df17852de in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #14 0x00007f7df052f133 in __libc_ifunc_impl_list () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () (gdb) frame 7 #7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 9665 in /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc (gdb) print osdmap $24 = std::shared_ptr<const OSDMap> (expired, weak count 0) = {get() = 0x559cba028000} (gdb) print *osdmap # pretty sane OSDMap (gdb) print sizeof(osdmap) $26 = 16 (gdb) x/2a &osdmap 0x559ca22acef0: 0x559cba028000 0x559cba0ec900 (gdb) frame 2 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 148 /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h: No such file or directory. (gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release(): ... 0x0000559c97675b1e <+62>: mov (%rdi),%rax 0x0000559c97675b21 <+65>: mov %rdi,%rbx 0x0000559c97675b24 <+68>: callq *0x10(%rax) => 0x0000559c97675b27 <+71>: test %rbp,%rbp ... End of assembler dump. (gdb) info registers rdi rbx rax rdi 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rbx 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rax 0x559cba0ec8a0 94131624790176 (gdb) x/a 0x559cba0ec8a0 + 0x10 0x559cba0ec8b0: 0x559cb81c3ea0 (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () ... (gdb) p $_siginfo._sifields._sigfault.si_addr $27 = (void *) 0x559cb81c3ea0 ``` Helgrind seems to agree: ``` ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Possible data race during write of size 8 at 0xF123930 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== This conflicts with a previous read of size 8 by thread ceph#117 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x2123E9A0 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x6B5842: __shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1165) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:129) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: get_osdmap (OSD.h:1700) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Address 0xf123930 is 3,824 bytes inside a block of size 10,296 alloc'd ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x66F766: main (ceph_osd.cc:688) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Block was alloc'd by thread #1 ``` Actually there is plenty of similar issues reported like: ``` ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Possible data race during read of size 8 at 0x1E3E0588 by thread ceph#119 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x1EAD41D0 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x753165: clear (hashtable.h:2051) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753165: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__deta il::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr _base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_count (shared_ptr_base.h:728) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1167) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== This conflicts with a previous write of size 8 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x7531E1: clear (hashtable.h:2054) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7531E1: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr_base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:747) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Address 0x1e3e0588 is 872 bytes inside a block of size 1,208 alloc'd ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6C7C0C: OSDService::try_get_map(unsigned int) (OSD.cc:1606) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:699) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:1732) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8076) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ``` Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzyns@redhat.com>
liewegas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2020
* no need to discard_result(). as `output_stream::close()` returns an
empty future<> already
* free the connected socket after the background task finishes, because:
we should not free the connected socket before the promise referencing it is fulfilled.
otherwise we have error messages from ASan, like
==287182==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x611000019aa0 at pc 0x55e2ae2de882 bp 0x7fff7e2bf080 sp 0x7fff7e2bf078
READ of size 8 at 0x611000019aa0 thread T0
#0 0x55e2ae2de881 in seastar::reactor_backend_aio::await_events(int, __sigset_t const*) ../src/seastar/src/core/reactor_backend.cc:396
#1 0x55e2ae2dfb59 in seastar::reactor_backend_aio::reap_kernel_completions() ../src/seastar/src/core/reactor_backend.cc:428
#2 0x55e2adbea397 in seastar::reactor::reap_kernel_completions_pollfn::poll() (/var/ssd/ceph/build/bin/crimson-osd+0x155e9397)
#3 0x55e2adaec6d0 in seastar::reactor::poll_once() ../src/seastar/src/core/reactor.cc:2789
#4 0x55e2adae7cf7 in operator() ../src/seastar/src/core/reactor.cc:2687
#5 0x55e2adb7c595 in __invoke_impl<bool, seastar::reactor::run()::<lambda()>&> /usr/include/c++/10/bits/invoke.h:60
#6 0x55e2adb699b0 in __invoke_r<bool, seastar::reactor::run()::<lambda()>&> /usr/include/c++/10/bits/invoke.h:113
#7 0x55e2adb50222 in _M_invoke /usr/include/c++/10/bits/std_function.h:291
#8 0x55e2adc2ba00 in std::function<bool ()>::operator()() const /usr/include/c++/10/bits/std_function.h:622
#9 0x55e2adaea491 in seastar::reactor::run() ../src/seastar/src/core/reactor.cc:2713
#10 0x55e2ad98f1c7 in seastar::app_template::run_deprecated(int, char**, std::function<void ()>&&) ../src/seastar/src/core/app-template.cc:199
#11 0x55e2a9e57538 in main ../src/crimson/osd/main.cc:148
#12 0x7fae7f20de0a in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
#13 0x55e2a9d431e9 in _start (/var/ssd/ceph/build/bin/crimson-osd+0x117421e9)
0x611000019aa0 is located 96 bytes inside of 240-byte region [0x611000019a40,0x611000019b30)
freed by thread T0 here:
#0 0x7fae80a4e487 in operator delete(void*, unsigned long) (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.6+0xac487)
#1 0x55e2ae302a0a in seastar::aio_pollable_fd_state::~aio_pollable_fd_state() ../src/seastar/src/core/reactor_backend.cc:458
#2 0x55e2ae2e1059 in seastar::reactor_backend_aio::forget(seastar::pollable_fd_state&) ../src/seastar/src/core/reactor_backend.cc:524
#3 0x55e2adab9b9a in seastar::pollable_fd_state::forget() ../src/seastar/src/core/reactor.cc:1396
#4 0x55e2adab9d05 in seastar::intrusive_ptr_release(seastar::pollable_fd_state*) ../src/seastar/src/core/reactor.cc:1401
#5 0x55e2ace1b72b in boost::intrusive_ptr<seastar::pollable_fd_state>::~intrusive_ptr() /opt/ceph/include/boost/smart_ptr/intrusive_ptr.hpp:98
#6 0x55e2ace115a5 in seastar::pollable_fd::~pollable_fd() ../src/seastar/include/seastar/core/internal/pollable_fd.hh:109
#7 0x55e2ae0ed35c in seastar::net::posix_server_socket_impl::~posix_server_socket_impl() ../src/seastar/include/seastar/net/posix-stack.hh:161
#8 0x55e2ae0ed3cf in seastar::net::posix_server_socket_impl::~posix_server_socket_impl() ../src/seastar/include/seastar/net/posix-stack.hh:161
#9 0x55e2ae0ed943 in std::default_delete<seastar::net::api_v2::server_socket_impl>::operator()(seastar::net::api_v2::server_socket_impl*) const /usr/include/c++/10/bits/unique_ptr.h:81
#10 0x55e2ae0db357 in std::unique_ptr<seastar::net::api_v2::server_socket_impl, std::default_delete<seastar::net::api_v2::server_socket_impl> >::~unique_ptr()
/usr/include/c++/10/bits/unique_ptr.h:357 #11 0x55e2ae1438b7 in seastar::api_v2::server_socket::~server_socket() ../src/seastar/src/net/stack.cc:195
#12 0x55e2aa1c7656 in std::_Optional_payload_base<seastar::api_v2::server_socket>::_M_destroy() /usr/include/c++/10/optional:260
#13 0x55e2aa16c84b in std::_Optional_payload_base<seastar::api_v2::server_socket>::_M_reset() /usr/include/c++/10/optional:280
#14 0x55e2ac24b2b7 in std::_Optional_base_impl<seastar::api_v2::server_socket, std::_Optional_base<seastar::api_v2::server_socket, false, false> >::_M_reset() /usr/include/c++/10/optional:432
#15 0x55e2ac23f37b in std::optional<seastar::api_v2::server_socket>::reset() /usr/include/c++/10/optional:975
#16 0x55e2ac21a2e7 in crimson::admin::AdminSocket::stop() ../src/crimson/admin/admin_socket.cc:265
#17 0x55e2aa099825 in operator() ../src/crimson/osd/osd.cc:450
#18 0x55e2aa0d4e3e in apply ../src/seastar/include/seastar/core/apply.hh:36
Signed-off-by: Kefu Chai <kchai@redhat.com>
liewegas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2021
Accordingly to cppreference.com [1]: "If multiple threads of execution access the same std::shared_ptr object without synchronization and any of those accesses uses a non-const member function of shared_ptr then a data race will occur (...)" [1]: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/shared_ptr/atomic One of the coredumps showed the `shared_ptr`-typed `OSD::osdmap` with healthy looking content but damaged control block: ``` [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7f7dcaf73700 (LWP 205295))] (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () #1 0x0000559c97675b27 in std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 #3 0x0000559c975ef8aa in std::__shared_count<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_count (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 #4 std::__shared_ptr<OSDMap const, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::~__shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:1167 #5 std::shared_ptr<OSDMap const>::~shared_ptr (this=<optimized out>, __in_chrg=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr.h:103 #6 OSD::create_context (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9053 #7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 #8 0x0000559c97886db6 in ceph::osd::scheduler::PGPeeringItem::run (this=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, sdata=<optimized out>, pg=..., handle=...) at /usr/include/c++/8/ext/atomicity.h:96 #9 0x0000559c9764862f in ceph::osd::scheduler::OpSchedulerItem::run (handle=..., pg=..., sdata=<optimized out>, osd=<optimized out>, this=0x7f7dcaf703f0) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/unique_ptr.h:342 #10 OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process (this=<optimized out>, thread_index=<optimized out>, hb=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:10677 #11 0x0000559c97c76094 in ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker (this=0x559ca22aca28, thread_index=14) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.cc:311 #12 0x0000559c97c78cf4 in ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/common/WorkQueue.h:706 #13 0x00007f7df17852de in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #14 0x00007f7df052f133 in __libc_ifunc_impl_list () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () (gdb) frame 7 #7 0x0000559c97655571 in OSD::dequeue_peering_evt (this=0x559ca22ac000, sdata=0x559ca2ef2900, pg=0x559cb4aa3400, evt=std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent> (use count 2, weak count 0) = {...}, handle=...) at /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc:9665 9665 in /usr/src/debug/ceph-15.0.0-10071.g5b5a3a3.el8.x86_64/src/osd/OSD.cc (gdb) print osdmap $24 = std::shared_ptr<const OSDMap> (expired, weak count 0) = {get() = 0x559cba028000} (gdb) print *osdmap # pretty sane OSDMap (gdb) print sizeof(osdmap) $26 = 16 (gdb) x/2a &osdmap 0x559ca22acef0: 0x559cba028000 0x559cba0ec900 (gdb) frame 2 #2 std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release (this=0x559cba0ec900) at /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:148 148 /usr/include/c++/8/bits/shared_ptr_base.h: No such file or directory. (gdb) disassemble Dump of assembler code for function std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release(): ... 0x0000559c97675b1e <+62>: mov (%rdi),%rax 0x0000559c97675b21 <+65>: mov %rdi,%rbx 0x0000559c97675b24 <+68>: callq *0x10(%rax) => 0x0000559c97675b27 <+71>: test %rbp,%rbp ... End of assembler dump. (gdb) info registers rdi rbx rax rdi 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rbx 0x559cba0ec900 94131624790272 rax 0x559cba0ec8a0 94131624790176 (gdb) x/a 0x559cba0ec8a0 + 0x10 0x559cba0ec8b0: 0x559cb81c3ea0 (gdb) bt #0 0x0000559cb81c3ea0 in ?? () ... (gdb) p $_siginfo._sifields._sigfault.si_addr $27 = (void *) 0x559cb81c3ea0 ``` Helgrind seems to agree: ``` ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Possible data race during write of size 8 at 0xF123930 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7218DD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== This conflicts with a previous read of size 8 by thread ceph#117 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x2123E9A0 ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0x6B5842: __shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1165) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:129) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: get_osdmap (OSD.h:1700) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x6B5842: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Address 0xf123930 is 3,824 bytes inside a block of size 10,296 alloc'd ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== by 0x66F766: main (ceph_osd.cc:688) ==00:00:02:54.519 510301== Block was alloc'd by thread #1 ``` Actually there is plenty of similar issues reported like: ``` ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Possible data race during read of size 8 at 0x1E3E0588 by thread ceph#119 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 1, at address 0x1EAD41D0 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x753165: clear (hashtable.h:2051) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753165: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__deta il::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr _base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_count (shared_ptr_base.h:728) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~__shared_ptr (shared_ptr_base.h:1167) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: ~shared_ptr (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6B58A9: OSD::create_context() (OSD.cc:9053) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B570: OSD::dequeue_peering_evt(OSDShard*, PG*, std::shared_ptr<PGPeeringEvent>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9665) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x71B997: OSD::dequeue_delete(OSDShard*, PG*, unsigned int, ThreadPool::TPHandle&) (OSD.cc:9701) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: run (OpSchedulerItem.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x70E62E: OSD::ShardedOpWQ::_process(unsigned int, ceph::heartbeat_handle_d*) (OSD.cc:10677) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3C093: ShardedThreadPool::shardedthreadpool_worker(unsigned int) (WorkQueue.cc:311) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD3ECF3: ShardedThreadPool::WorkThreadSharded::entry() (WorkQueue.h:706) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== This conflicts with a previous write of size 8 by thread ceph#90 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Locks held: 2, at addresses 0xF122A58 0xF1239A8 ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0x7531E1: clear (hashtable.h:2054) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7531E1: std::_Hashtable<entity_addr_t, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t>, mempool::pool_allocator<(mempool::pool_index_t)15, std::pair<entity_addr_t const, utime_t> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<entity_addr_t>, std::hash<entity_addr_t>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<true, false, true> >::~_Hashtable() (hashtable.h:1369) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: ~unordered_map (unordered_map.h:102) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x75331C: OSDMap::~OSDMap() (OSDMap.h:350) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: operator() (shared_cache.hpp:100) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x753606: std::_Sp_counted_deleter<OSDMap const*, SharedLRU<unsigned int, OSDMap const>::Cleanup, std::allocator<void>, (__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_dispose() (shared_ptr_base.h:471) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: _M_release (shared_ptr_base.h:155) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x73BB26: std::_Sp_counted_base<(__gnu_cxx::_Lock_policy)2>::_M_release() (shared_ptr_base.h:148) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:747) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr_base.h:1078) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: operator= (shared_ptr.h:103) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72191E: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8116) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== Address 0x1e3e0588 is 872 bytes inside a block of size 1,208 alloc'd ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== at 0xA7DC0C3: operator new[](unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:433) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x6C7C0C: OSDService::try_get_map(unsigned int) (OSD.cc:1606) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:699) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: get_map (OSD.h:1732) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7213BD: OSD::_committed_osd_maps(unsigned int, unsigned int, MOSDMap*) (OSD.cc:8076) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x7752CA: C_OnMapCommit::finish(int) (OSD.cc:7678) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0x72A06C: Context::complete(int) (Context.h:77) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD07F14: Finisher::finisher_thread_entry() (Finisher.cc:66) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xA7E1203: mythread_wrapper (hg_intercepts.c:389) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xC6182DD: start_thread (in /usr/lib64/libpthread-2.28.so) ==00:00:05:04.903 510301== by 0xD8B34B2: clone (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.28.so) ``` Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzyns@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 80da5f9) Conflicts: src/osd/OSD.cc in bool OSD::asok_command int OSD::shutdown void OSD::maybe_update_heartbeat_peers void OSD::_preboot void OSD::queue_want_up_thru void OSD::send_alive void OSD::send_failures void OSD::send_beacon MPGStats* OSD::collect_pg_stats void OSD::note_down_osd void OSD::consume_map void OSD::activate_map src/osd/OSD.h in private: dispatch_session_waiting - also use the new const OSDMapRef in places that no longer exist in master src/osd/OSD.cc in void OSDService::share_map void OSDService::send_incremental_map int OSD::_do_command void OSD::note_up_osd int OSD::init_op_flags src/osd/OSD.h in void send_incremental_map void share_map
liewegas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2021
Feature/62 more content modules
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…atch. Starts using it for BufferCacheTest
Signed-off-by: Igor Fedotov ifedotov@mirantis.com