Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor correction of formula in Route Blinding subsection: $e_0 /leftarrow {0;1}^256$ --> $e_0 \leftarrow {0;1}^{256}$ #1157

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dple
Copy link

@dple dple commented Apr 29, 2024

No description provided.

@t-bast
Copy link
Collaborator

t-bast commented Apr 29, 2024

I'm seeing a few other issues that were missed in @Roasbeef's #1151 and should be fixed:

  • line 502: most of the text is truncated
  • line 508: E_{i+1} doesn't render correctly
  • line 521: the backticks of "blinded_node_id" don't render correctly
  • there are occurences of E_i and E_r in the Rationale section, which should be updated to $E_i$ and $E_r$?

dple added a commit to dple/bolts that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
@t-bast
Copy link
Collaborator

t-bast commented Apr 30, 2024

Closed in favor of #1158

@t-bast t-bast closed this Apr 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants