BOLT-04: replace quotation marks used in math expressions #1158
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In this commit, we propose a change of quotation marks being used in math expression. Rather than using " (e.g., $"rho_i"$), we use $``rho''$ that will be rendered better in Latex
t-bast
reviewed
Apr 30, 2024
| - $`e_{i+1} = SHA256(E_i || ss_i) * e_i`$ (blinding ephemeral private key, only known by $`N_r`$) | ||
| - $`E_{i+1} = SHA256(E_i || ss_i) * E_i`$ (NB: $`N_i`$ MUST NOT learn $`e_i`$) | ||
| - MAY replace $`E_{i+1}`$ with a different value, but if it does: | ||
| - MUST set `encrypted_data_tlv[i].next_blinding_override` to `$E_{i+1}$` | ||
| - MUST set `encrypted_data_tlv[i].next_blinding_override` to $`E_{i+1}`$ | ||
| - MAY store private data in `encrypted_data_tlv[r].path_id` to verify that the route is used in the right context and was created by them | ||
| - SHOULD add padding data to ensure all `encrypted_data_tlv[i]` have the same length | ||
| - MUST encrypt each `encrypted_data_tlv[i]` with ChaCha20-Poly1305 using the corresponding `rho_i` key and an all-zero nonce to produce `encrypted_recipient_data[i]` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit:
Suggested change
| - MUST encrypt each `encrypted_data_tlv[i]` with ChaCha20-Poly1305 using the corresponding `rho_i` key and an all-zero nonce to produce `encrypted_recipient_data[i]` | |
| - MUST encrypt each `encrypted_data_tlv[i]` with ChaCha20-Poly1305 using the corresponding $`rho_i`$ key and an all-zero nonce to produce `encrypted_recipient_data[i]` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@dple this comment is not for the line you're referring to in your screenshot, you're confusing it with #1158 (comment)
Can you fix line 511 (see the first part of this comment) and #1158 (comment), and then we can merge this PR?
ProofOfKeags
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2024
| @@ -495,17 +495,17 @@ may contain the following TLV fields: | |||
| A recipient $`N_r`$ creating a blinded route $`N_0 \rightarrow N_1 \rightarrow ... \rightarrow N_r`$ to itself: | |||
|
|
|||
| - MUST create a blinded node ID $`B_i`$ for each node using the following algorithm: | |||
| - $`e_0 /leftarrow {0;1}^256`$ ($`e_0`$ SHOULD be obtained via CSPRG) | |||
| - $`e_0 \leftarrow \{0;1\}^{256}`$ ($`e_0`$ SHOULD be obtained via CSPRG) | |||
25 tasks
Closed
Roasbeef
approved these changes
May 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In this commit, we propose a change of quotation marks being used in math expression. Rather than using " (e.g.,$"rho_i"$ ), we use $``rho''$ that will be rendered better in Latex