Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

meta: update the link to the ML #1170

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vincenzopalazzo
Copy link
Contributor

This commit is updating the link to the ML and
redirect users to delvingbitcoin forum.

We started using the delvingbitcoin bitcoin until we decided to switch to another platform last year. See [1] for more details

1. ML Future discussion

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
This commit is updating the link to the ML and
redirect users to delvingbitcoin forum.

We started using the delvingbitcoin bitcoin until we decided to switch to another platform last year. See [1] for more details

[1. ML Future discussion](https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2023-December/004231.html)
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

Maybe we should discuss whether we're happy with delving, it doesn't really seem like people are really using it for lightning discussion.

@ProofOfKeags
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe we should discuss whether we're happy with delving, it doesn't really seem like people are really using it for lightning discussion.

How are you evaluating this? Afaict the ML is even quieter than delving and I've been part of a few threads that are pretty big LN topics.

@vincenzopalazzo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe we should discuss whether we're happy with delving, it doesn't really seem like people are really using it for lightning discussion.

I am proposing to discuss this in the summit in Tokyo, I still need to post the comment, but I am planning to bring up this

@vincenzopalazzo
Copy link
Contributor Author

How are you evaluating this? Afaict the ML is even quieter than delving and I've been part of a few threads that are pretty big LN topics.

I think the problem is not that delving Bitcoin is no thread about lightning, but if the delving is slowing down the contribution or if it is making confusing contribute

Plus, we should also solve the problem of reviewing big PR, like offers it is quite messy on github, and ML could help here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants