-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
incorrect mapping to skos #27
Comments
Hi Paul Thanks for noticing that, I will push the correction in the next few days. Franck |
Hi Frank, I still do not see the correction. Paul |
Is it that difficult?? |
No, It's not difficult. A change which can be made in 5 minutes by the editor. Paul On 26 Jan 2016, at 18:55, Yang <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote: Is it that difficult?? Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/27#issuecomment-175113986. |
Fixed in commit 61f5f6d, I hope I have got it right this time. Sorry it took so long. |
Will have a look shortly. Paul From: Franck Cotton <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> Fixed in commit 61f5f6dhttps://github.com/linked-statistics/xkos/commit/61f5f6dff3fec8620be0f0fd1bea42ab29b2992c, I hope I have got it right this time. Sorry it took so long. — |
As per [issue 27](linked-statistics#27), `xkos:isPartOf` should actually be a sub-property of `skos:broader` (since the interpretation is that the subject concept "has a broader" object concept, e.g. `:Apple skos:broader :Fruit`). The data representation of the vocabulary itself was fixed in #61f5f6. This patch updates the html documentation to match.
I'm afraid some parts of XKOS are not correctly mapped to SKOS.
E.g.
xkos:hasPart is a sub-type of skos:broader
xkos:isPartOf is a sub-type of skos:narrower
If I say :x xkos:hasPart :y, then I am saying that :x is bigger/broader/containing :y.
Following your specification,
I'm saying then also :x skos:broader :y, which semantics are :x has broader :y.
Which is precisely the opposite of what has been previously said.
Figure 9 shows it correctly where hasPart is mapped to narrower.
But http://rdf-vocabulary.ddialliance.org/xkos.rdf also contains the error.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: