initlize struct lfs_diskoff disk = {0}

[mdahamshi]

so we don't use it uninitlized in first run

[geky-bot]

Tests passed ✓, Code: 16678 B (+0.1%), Stack: 1432 B (+0.0%), Structs: 788 B (+0.0%)

	Code	Stack	Structs		Coverage
Default	16678 B (+0.1%)	1432 B (+0.0%)	788 B (+0.0%)	Lines	2316/2496 lines (+0.0%)
Readonly	6126 B (+0.0%)	448 B (+0.0%)	788 B (+0.0%)	Branches	1184/1506 branches (-0.0%)
Threadsafe	17506 B (+0.1%)	1432 B (+0.0%)	796 B (+0.0%)		Benchmarks
Multiversion	16754 B (+0.1%)	1432 B (+0.0%)	792 B (+0.0%)	Readed	29369693876 B (+0.0%)
Migrate	18362 B (+0.1%)	1736 B (+0.0%)	792 B (+0.0%)	Proged	1482874766 B (+0.0%)
Error-asserts	17310 B (+0.0%)	1424 B (+0.0%)	788 B (+0.0%)	Erased	1568888832 B (+0.0%)

[geky]

Hi @mdahamshi, thanks for creating a PR.

It's worth noting that this struct does not get used unless the top-bit of the tag is set, which only happens when we initialize the struct's contents.

But we can bring this in to at least silence the warning.

[geky-bot]

Tests passed ✓, Code: 16678 B (+0.1%), Stack: 1432 B (+0.0%), Structs: 788 B (+0.0%)

	Code	Stack	Structs		Coverage
Default	16678 B (+0.1%)	1432 B (+0.0%)	788 B (+0.0%)	Lines	2316/2496 lines (+0.0%)
Readonly	6126 B (+0.0%)	448 B (+0.0%)	788 B (+0.0%)	Branches	1184/1506 branches (-0.0%)
Threadsafe	17506 B (+0.1%)	1432 B (+0.0%)	796 B (+0.0%)		Benchmarks
Multiversion	16754 B (+0.1%)	1432 B (+0.0%)	792 B (+0.0%)	Readed	29369693876 B (+0.0%)
Migrate	18362 B (+0.1%)	1736 B (+0.0%)	792 B (+0.0%)	Proged	1482874766 B (+0.0%)
Error-asserts	17310 B (+0.0%)	1424 B (+0.0%)	788 B (+0.0%)	Erased	1568888832 B (+0.0%)

[geky]

Thanks again for this, and everyone else who reported/proposed a fix. Sorry about taking so long to merge. There was some integration issues in the dependent littlefs-fuse I wanted to fix before making another release.