Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ASan][AMDGPU] Fix Assertion Failure. #78242

Closed

Conversation

ampandey-1995
Copy link
Contributor

Assertion failure `(i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Args[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"'. The 'llvm.memcpy' intercepted by ASan instrumentation pass is implemented by it's own __asan_memcpy implementation. The second argument of llvm.memcpy accepts ptr to addrspace(4), __asan_memcpy also has to follow ptr to addrspace(4) convention.

Assertion failure `(i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) ==
Args[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"'.  The
'llvm.memcpy' intercepted by ASan instrumentation pass is implemented by it's
own __asan_memcpy implementation. The second argument of llvm.memcpy accepts ptr
to addrspace(4), __asan_memcpy also has to follow ptr to addrspace(4)
convention.
Copy link

Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write
permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by
name in a comment by using @ followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review
by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate
is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide.

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Jan 16, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms

Author: None (ampandey-1995)

Changes

Assertion failure `(i >= FTy->getNumParams() || FTy->getParamType(i) == Args[i]->getType()) && "Calling a function with a bad signature!"'. The 'llvm.memcpy' intercepted by ASan instrumentation pass is implemented by it's own __asan_memcpy implementation. The second argument of llvm.memcpy accepts ptr to addrspace(4), __asan_memcpy also has to follow ptr to addrspace(4) convention.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78242.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp (+5-3)
  • (added) llvm/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/AMDGPU/asan_instrument_mem_intrinsics.ll (+48)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp
index fb5838bb7941ad..32e7f1b6fc3374 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp
@@ -1254,9 +1254,11 @@ Value *AddressSanitizer::memToShadow(Value *Shadow, IRBuilder<> &IRB) {
 void AddressSanitizer::instrumentMemIntrinsic(MemIntrinsic *MI) {
   InstrumentationIRBuilder IRB(MI);
   if (isa<MemTransferInst>(MI)) {
-    IRB.CreateCall(isa<MemMoveInst>(MI) ? AsanMemmove : AsanMemcpy,
-                   {MI->getOperand(0), MI->getOperand(1),
-                    IRB.CreateIntCast(MI->getOperand(2), IntptrTy, false)});
+    IRB.CreateCall(
+        isa<MemMoveInst>(MI) ? AsanMemmove : AsanMemcpy,
+        {MI->getOperand(0),
+         IRB.CreatePointerBitCastOrAddrSpaceCast(MI->getOperand(1), PtrTy),
+         IRB.CreateIntCast(MI->getOperand(2), IntptrTy, false)});
   } else if (isa<MemSetInst>(MI)) {
     IRB.CreateCall(
         AsanMemset,
diff --git a/llvm/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/AMDGPU/asan_instrument_mem_intrinsics.ll b/llvm/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/AMDGPU/asan_instrument_mem_intrinsics.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..26258ef384795d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/AMDGPU/asan_instrument_mem_intrinsics.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+;RUN: opt < %s -passes=asan -S | FileCheck %s
+
+target datalayout = "e-p:64:64-p1:64:64-p2:32:32-p3:32:32-p4:64:64-p5:32:32-p6:32:32-p7:160:256:256:32-p8:128:128-p9:192:256:256:32-i64:64-v16:16-v24:32-v32:32-v48:64-v96:128-v192:256-v256:256-v512:512-v1024:1024-v2048:2048-n32:64-S32-A5-G1-ni:7:8:9"
+target triple = "amdgcn-amd-amdhsa"
+
+@__const.__assert_fail.fmt = private unnamed_addr addrspace(4) constant [47 x i8] c"%s:%u: %s: Device-side assertion `%s' failed.\0A\00", align 16
+
+; Function Attrs: nocallback nofree nounwind willreturn memory(argmem: readwrite)
+declare void @llvm.memcpy.p0.p4.i64(ptr noalias nocapture writeonly, ptr addrspace(4) noalias nocapture readonly, i64, i1 immarg) #1
+
+; Function Attrs: convergent mustprogress noinline nounwind optnone
+define weak hidden void @test_mem_intrinsic() sanitize_address #0 {
+; CHECK: define weak hidden void @test_mem_intrinsic() #1 {
+; CHECK-NEXT: entry:
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[FMT:%.*]] = alloca [47 x i8], align 16, addrspace(5)
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[FADDRC:%.*]] = addrspacecast ptr addrspace(5) [[FMT]] to ptr
+; CHECK-NEXT: [[ITMP:%.*]] = call ptr @__asan_memcpy(ptr [[FADDRC]], ptr addrspacecast (ptr addrspace(4) @__const.__assert_fail.fmt to ptr), i64 47)
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+entry:
+%fmt = alloca [47 x i8], align 16, addrspace(5)
+%fmt.ascast = addrspacecast ptr addrspace(5) %fmt to ptr
+call void @llvm.memcpy.p0.p4.i64(ptr align 16 %fmt.ascast, ptr addrspace(4) align 16 @__const.__assert_fail.fmt, i64 47, i1 false)
+ret void
+}
+
+
+
+attributes #0 = { convergent mustprogress noinline nounwind optnone "frame-pointer"="all" "no-trapping-math"="true" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "target-cpu"="gfx906" "target-features"="+16-bit-insts,+ci-insts,+dl-insts,+dot1-insts,+dot10-insts,+dot2-insts,+dot7-insts,+dpp,+gfx8-insts,+gfx9-insts,+s-memrealtime,+s-memtime-inst,+wavefrontsize64,+xnack" }
+attributes #1 = { nocallback nofree nounwind willreturn memory(argmem: readwrite) }
+attributes #2 = { convergent nounwind "frame-pointer"="all" "no-trapping-math"="true" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "target-cpu"="gfx906" "target-features"="+16-bit-insts,+ci-insts,+dl-insts,+dot1-insts,+dot10-insts,+dot2-insts,+dot7-insts,+dpp,+gfx8-insts,+gfx9-insts,+s-memrealtime,+s-memtime-inst,+wavefrontsize64,+xnack" }
+attributes #3 = { cold noreturn nounwind memory(inaccessiblemem: write) }
+attributes #4 = { convergent mustprogress noinline norecurse nounwind optnone "amdgpu-flat-work-group-size"="1,1024" "frame-pointer"="all" "no-trapping-math"="true" "stack-protector-buffer-size"="8" "target-cpu"="gfx906" "target-features"="+16-bit-insts,+ci-insts,+dl-insts,+dot1-insts,+dot10-insts,+dot2-insts,+dot7-insts,+dpp,+gfx8-insts,+gfx9-insts,+s-memrealtime,+s-memtime-inst,+wavefrontsize64,+xnack" "uniform-work-group-size"="true" }
+attributes #5 = { convergent nounwind }
+
+!llvm.module.flags = !{!0, !1, !2, !3, !4}
+!llvm.ident = !{!5}
+
+!0 = !{i32 1, !"amdgpu_code_object_version", i32 400}
+!1 = !{i32 1, !"amdgpu_printf_kind", !"hostcall"}
+!2 = !{i32 1, !"wchar_size", i32 4}
+!3 = !{i32 8, !"PIC Level", i32 2}
+!4 = !{i32 7, !"frame-pointer", i32 2}
+!5 = !{!"clang version 18.0.0git (git@github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git a919fe73e2c4c26fbb2a6f0459ff6564a5c83943)"}
+!6 = distinct !{!6, !7}
+!7 = !{!"llvm.loop.mustprogress"}
+!8 = distinct !{!8, !7}
+!9 = distinct !{!9, !7}
+!10 = distinct !{!10, !7}

IRB.CreateCall(
isa<MemMoveInst>(MI) ? AsanMemmove : AsanMemcpy,
{MI->getOperand(0),
IRB.CreatePointerBitCastOrAddrSpaceCast(MI->getOperand(1), PtrTy),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No reason to create pointer bit casts anymore. Just CreateAddrSpaceCast?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @arsenm Can you please review #78410.

I have made changes according to your comments.

!llvm.module.flags = !{!0, !1, !2, !3, !4}
!llvm.ident = !{!5}

!0 = !{i32 1, !"amdgpu_code_object_version", i32 400}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't need most of this metadata or most of the attributes

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Made changes in PR #78410

@ampandey-1995
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this PR in favour of #78410

@ampandey-1995 ampandey-1995 deleted the ampandey-LLVM/assertion-fix branch January 17, 2024 08:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants