Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release/18.x: [AArch64] Remove invalid uabdl patterns. (#89272) #89380

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 30, 2024

Conversation

RSilicon
Copy link
Contributor

These were added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D14208, which look like they attempt to detect abs from xor+add+ashr. They do not appear to be detecting the correct value for the src input though, which I think is intended to be the sub(zext, zext) part of the pattern. We have pattens from abs now, so the old invalid patterns can be removed.

Fixes #88784

(cherry picked from commit 851462f)

@llvmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

llvmbot commented Apr 19, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64

Author: AtariDreams (AtariDreams)

Changes

These were added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D14208, which look like they attempt to detect abs from xor+add+ashr. They do not appear to be detecting the correct value for the src input though, which I think is intended to be the sub(zext, zext) part of the pattern. We have pattens from abs now, so the old invalid patterns can be removed.

Fixes #88784

(cherry picked from commit 851462f)


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89380.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.td (-10)
  • (modified) llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-vabs.ll (+48)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.td b/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.td
index 03baa7497615e3..ac61dd8745d4e6 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.td
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AArch64/AArch64InstrInfo.td
@@ -4885,19 +4885,9 @@ defm UABDL   : SIMDLongThreeVectorBHSabdl<1, 0b0111, "uabdl",
 def : Pat<(abs (v8i16 (sub (zext (v8i8 V64:$opA)),
                            (zext (v8i8 V64:$opB))))),
           (UABDLv8i8_v8i16 V64:$opA, V64:$opB)>;
-def : Pat<(xor (v8i16 (AArch64vashr v8i16:$src, (i32 15))),
-               (v8i16 (add (sub (zext (v8i8 V64:$opA)),
-                                (zext (v8i8 V64:$opB))),
-                           (AArch64vashr v8i16:$src, (i32 15))))),
-          (UABDLv8i8_v8i16 V64:$opA, V64:$opB)>;
 def : Pat<(abs (v8i16 (sub (zext (extract_high_v16i8 (v16i8 V128:$opA))),
                            (zext (extract_high_v16i8 (v16i8 V128:$opB)))))),
           (UABDLv16i8_v8i16 V128:$opA, V128:$opB)>;
-def : Pat<(xor (v8i16 (AArch64vashr v8i16:$src, (i32 15))),
-               (v8i16 (add (sub (zext (extract_high_v16i8 (v16i8 V128:$opA))),
-                                (zext (extract_high_v16i8 (v16i8 V128:$opB)))),
-                           (AArch64vashr v8i16:$src, (i32 15))))),
-          (UABDLv16i8_v8i16 V128:$opA, V128:$opB)>;
 def : Pat<(abs (v4i32 (sub (zext (v4i16 V64:$opA)),
                            (zext (v4i16 V64:$opB))))),
           (UABDLv4i16_v4i32 V64:$opA, V64:$opB)>;
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-vabs.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-vabs.ll
index fe4da2e7cf36b5..89c8d540b97e04 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-vabs.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-vabs.ll
@@ -1848,3 +1848,51 @@ define <2 x i128> @uabd_i64(<2 x i64> %a, <2 x i64> %b) {
   %absel = select <2 x i1> %abcmp, <2 x i128> %ababs, <2 x i128> %abdiff
   ret <2 x i128> %absel
 }
+
+define <8 x i16> @pr88784(<8 x i8> %l0, <8 x i8> %l1, <8 x i16> %l2) {
+; CHECK-SD-LABEL: pr88784:
+; CHECK-SD:       // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-SD-NEXT:    usubl.8h v0, v0, v1
+; CHECK-SD-NEXT:    cmlt.8h v1, v2, #0
+; CHECK-SD-NEXT:    ssra.8h v0, v2, #15
+; CHECK-SD-NEXT:    eor.16b v0, v1, v0
+; CHECK-SD-NEXT:    ret
+;
+; CHECK-GI-LABEL: pr88784:
+; CHECK-GI:       // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-GI-NEXT:    usubl.8h v0, v0, v1
+; CHECK-GI-NEXT:    sshr.8h v1, v2, #15
+; CHECK-GI-NEXT:    ssra.8h v0, v2, #15
+; CHECK-GI-NEXT:    eor.16b v0, v1, v0
+; CHECK-GI-NEXT:    ret
+  %l4 = zext <8 x i8> %l0 to <8 x i16>
+  %l5 = ashr <8 x i16> %l2, <i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15>
+  %l6 = zext <8 x i8> %l1 to <8 x i16>
+  %l7 = sub <8 x i16> %l4, %l6
+  %l8 = add <8 x i16> %l5, %l7
+  %l9 = xor <8 x i16> %l5, %l8
+  ret <8 x i16> %l9
+}
+
+define <8 x i16> @pr88784_fixed(<8 x i8> %l0, <8 x i8> %l1, <8 x i16> %l2) {
+; CHECK-SD-LABEL: pr88784_fixed:
+; CHECK-SD:       // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-SD-NEXT:    uabdl.8h v0, v0, v1
+; CHECK-SD-NEXT:    ret
+;
+; CHECK-GI-LABEL: pr88784_fixed:
+; CHECK-GI:       // %bb.0:
+; CHECK-GI-NEXT:    usubl.8h v0, v0, v1
+; CHECK-GI-NEXT:    sshr.8h v1, v0, #15
+; CHECK-GI-NEXT:    ssra.8h v0, v0, #15
+; CHECK-GI-NEXT:    eor.16b v0, v1, v0
+; CHECK-GI-NEXT:    ret
+  %l4 = zext <8 x i8> %l0 to <8 x i16>
+  %l6 = zext <8 x i8> %l1 to <8 x i16>
+  %l7 = sub <8 x i16> %l4, %l6
+  %l5 = ashr <8 x i16> %l7, <i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15>
+  %l8 = add <8 x i16> %l5, %l7
+  %l9 = xor <8 x i16> %l5, %l8
+  ret <8 x i16> %l9
+}
+

@RSilicon
Copy link
Contributor Author

@arsenm @nikic What do you think about this?

@RKSimon RKSimon requested a review from davemgreen April 23, 2024 14:07
Copy link
Collaborator

@davemgreen davemgreen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should be OK for the branch, if it is wanted. It should be a safe commit to backport, considering it just removes some invalid patterns. LGTM.

These were added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D14208, which look like
they attempt to detect abs from xor+add+ashr. They do not appear to be
detecting the correct value for the src input though, which I think is
intended to be the sub(zext, zext) part of the pattern. We have pattens
from abs now, so the old invalid patterns can be removed.

Fixes llvm#88784

(cherry picked from commit 851462f)
@tstellar tstellar merged commit a96b044 into llvm:release/18.x Apr 30, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@RSilicon RSilicon deleted the uabdl-18 branch May 1, 2024 12:40
@tstellar
Copy link
Collaborator

tstellar commented May 1, 2024

Hi @AtariDreams (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the release:note label to this PR.

@RSilicon
Copy link
Contributor Author

RSilicon commented May 3, 2024

I would add "Fixed issue where on AArch64 some patterns would be miscompiled."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants