Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Upgrade LNPBP-4 with merke trees #103

Open
dr-orlovsky opened this issue Mar 25, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Upgrade LNPBP-4 with merke trees #103

dr-orlovsky opened this issue Mar 25, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
@dr-orlovsky
Labels
[CSV] Client-side validation-related specs enhancement New feature or request *privacy* Issues important for privacy matters *scalability* Issues important for scalability
Milestone
CSV

Comments

@dr-orlovsky
Copy link
Member

Discussion: https://t.me/rgbtelegram/13775

Probably we can upgrade LNPBP-4 with Merkle tree, such that we can move up to 64k of assets for the same UTXO w/o increasing the size of the proof as 32N, but instead of 32log(N) With merkle tree we can still have a provable position data
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky added enhancement New feature or request [DBC] Deterministic bitcoin commitments *scalability* Issues important for scalability labels Mar 25, 2021
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky added this to the DBC: proposals milestone Mar 25, 2021
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky self-assigned this Mar 25, 2021
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky added [CSV] Client-side validation-related specs *privacy* Issues important for privacy matters and removed [DBC] Deterministic bitcoin commitments labels May 13, 2021
@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky mentioned this issue Aug 26, 2021
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dr-orlovsky dr-orlovsky

Labels
[CSV] Client-side validation-related specs enhancement New feature or request *privacy* Issues important for privacy matters *scalability* Issues important for scalability
Projects
None yet
Milestone
CSV
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dr-orlovsky