Merge pull request #275 from mpelz/patch-3

Update conditional_logic.rst

app/components/exp-frame-base/conditional_logic.rst

@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ Here's an example where we have an experimental "procedure" that depends on cond
                     "title": "Thank you!",
                     "text": "Thank you for participating in this study. Your child was in the "
                 },
-                "generateProperties": "function(expData, sequence, child, pastSessions, conditions) {if (conditions['1-study-procedure']['conditionNum'] == 0) {return {'debriefing': {'title': 'Thank you!', 'text': 'Your child was in the cats condition.'}};} else  {return {'debriefing': {'title': 'Thank you!', 'text': 'Your child was in the dogs condition.'}};} }"
+                "generateProperties": "function(expData, sequence, child, pastSessions, conditions) {if (conditions['0-study-procedure']['conditionNum'] == 0) {return {'debriefing': {'title': 'Thank you!', 'text': 'Your child was in the cats condition.'}};} else  {return {'debriefing': {'title': 'Thank you!', 'text': 'Your child was in the dogs condition.'}};} }"
             },
             "study-procedure": {
                 "sampler": "random-parameter-set",
@@ -315,4 +315,4 @@ Here's an example where we have an experimental "procedure" that depends on cond
         ]
     }
 
-Your debriefing information could also take into account other factors - for instance, if you were conducting a give-N task, you could actually give an automatic estimate of the child's knower-level or show a chart of their responses! As an exercise, try personalizing the debriefing text to use the child's name.
+Your debriefing information could also take into account other factors - for instance, if you were conducting a give-N task, you could actually give an automatic estimate of the child's knower-level or show a chart of their responses! As an exercise, try personalizing the debriefing text to use the child's name.