Prepare for v1.3.0

[harto]

Is master stable enough for a v1.3.0 release? Have people tried out join(), includes(), etc?
/cc @lox

[bjornpost]

include() still has some issues: #105 (comment)

[harto]

Thanks @bjornpost -- I'll take a look.

[lox]

Much appreciated @harto!

[harto]

Currently blocked on #109.

[harto]

I'm thinking about cutting a 1.3.0 release that excludes include(). IMO it needs more work before it could be considered production-ready, and I don't think anybody has the bandwidth to work on fixing it right now -- but I'd like to get the other two features mentioned in CHANGELOG into 1.3.0.
Thoughts @lox?

[lox]

Yup, do it.

• Lox

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Stuart Campbell
notifications@github.comwrote:

I'm thinking about cutting a 1.3.0 release that excludes include(). IMO
it needs more work before it could be considered production-ready, and I
don't think anybody has the bandwidth to work on fixing it right now -- but
I'd like to get the other two features mentioned in CHANGELOG into 1.3.0.
Thoughts @lox https://github.com/lox?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/108#issuecomment-44361896
.