Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

3.9 King in check #80

Closed
lrozenblyum opened this issue Jan 3, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

3.9 King in check #80

lrozenblyum opened this issue Jan 3, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels
rules
Milestone
0.1

Comments

@lrozenblyum
Copy link
Owner

"The king is said to be 'in check' if it is attacked by one or more of the opponent's pieces, even if such pieces are constrained from moving to that square because they would then leave or place their own king in check. No piece can be moved that will either expose the king of the same colour to check or leave that king in check."

Practically need to limit amount of moves to only those ones which don't leave the king in check (not exposing the king to check looks like already implemented )
lrozenblyum added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 7, 2014
@lrozenblyum
Piece-agnostic solution to exclude moves that cause our king to be ex…
fef6167 
…posed to check #80
lrozenblyum added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 7, 2014
@lrozenblyum
Promotion also is blocked when king becomes exposed to check #80
5638c8d
lrozenblyum added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 7, 2014
@lrozenblyum
Integration test to validate No piece can be moved that will either e…
54844b0 
…xpose the king of the same colour to leave that king in check. #80
lrozenblyum added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 7, 2014
@lrozenblyum
Check is considered even if such pieces are constrained from moving t…
a60d708 
…o that square because they would then leave or place their own king in check. Implements #80
@lrozenblyum lrozenblyum mentioned this issue May 2, 2014
Open
@lrozenblyum
Copy link
Owner Author

Referring to parent issue #65

@lrozenblyum lrozenblyum added this to the 0.1 milestone Feb 16, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
rules
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@lrozenblyum