Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
updated thru UGP
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
MelissaGraham committed Oct 18, 2023
1 parent 48d953b commit 00d65f5
Showing 1 changed file with 18 additions and 17 deletions.
35 changes: 18 additions & 17 deletions sec_proc.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -354,49 +354,50 @@ \subsection{User-Generated Processing}\label{ssec:proc_user}
As described above, custom coadds (e.g., weekly, monthly) are also left to users
to generate, as required by their specific science goals.

\textbf{Computational resources -- }
Users will have access to the LSST Science Pipelines and data processing
infrastructure, as well as dedicated computational resources next-to-the-data,
via the Rubin Science Platform; \citeds{lse-319}.
Details of the planned ``User Batch" facility for data processing are described in
\citeds{dmtn-202}.
Very computationally intense user processing might require external resources.

\textbf{Adopting user code or data products --}
It is expected that some User-Generated pipelines and data products
might be ``adopted" or ``federated" into the LSST Science Pipelines and the Prompt
and Data Release data products, however, details regarding the federation of
user-generated data products are to be provided elsewhere.
and Data Release data products.
Details regarding this are to be provided elsewhere.

\textbf{A note prompt processing and alert production -- }
\textbf{Alert production is restricted -- }
User-Generated Processing will not be able to release alert packets in the LSST alert stream.
As the latency on processed visit image availability has an 80-hour
embargo, no user-generated pipeline will be able to process Special Programs
data on a timescale similar to prompt processing and alert production
(60 seconds to 24 hours).
No user-generated pipeline may contribute alerts to the LSST alert stream on
Thus, no User-Generated Processing may contribute alerts to the LSST alert stream on
any timescale.

Appendix~\ref{sec:spcs} provides more detailed, step-by-step data processing examples
for some potential Special Programs as further illustration.
Further examples of User-Generated Processing are provided below.

\subsubsection{Deep Drilling Fields}

User-generated data products might include, for example, DDF images coadded on custom
timescales (e.g., weekly, monthly), or coadded using algorithms outside of the LSST
Science Pipelines.

User-Generated Processing and data products might include, for example, DDF images coadded
on custom timescales (e.g., weekly, monthly), or coadded using algorithms outside of the
LSST Science Pipelines.

\subsubsection{Short-Exposure Mini-Surveys}

Short-exposure images obtained during twilight, which will have a very bright sky
background unlike other LSST images, might require user-generated algorithms to
subtract the high sky background.

Short-exposure images obtained during the night would have fewer stars for
astrometric and photometric calibration, and might require user-generated
processing pipelines.
background unlike other LSST images, might require specialized algorithms
to subtract the high sky background which are not available in the LSST Science Pipelines,
and might require User-Generated Processing.

Short-exposure images obtained during the night might have too-few stars to satisfy the
astrometric and photometric calibration routines in the LSST Science Pipelines,
and might require User-Generated Processing.

\subsubsection{Mini-Surveys}

Mini-surveys with time-domain science goals that aren't met by the Prompt pipelines,
e.g., those that require difference imaging with coadded images on an intermediate
timescale (e.g., a weekly stack), would require user-generated processing.
timescale (e.g., a weekly stack), would require User-Generated Processing.

0 comments on commit 00d65f5

Please sign in to comment.