Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-43416: Migrate AP code to external APDB configs #210

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kfindeisen
Copy link
Member

@kfindeisen kfindeisen commented Apr 26, 2024

This PR modifies DiaPipelineTask to use new-style configs instead of a nested ApdbConfig field, and updates the unit tests for TestTotalUnassociatedObjects to reflect lsst/verify#124. It also does some simplification of the task's unit tests.

Copy link
Contributor

@isullivan isullivan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, a few minor comments.

tests/test_diaPipe.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
python/lsst/ap/association/diaPipe.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
python/lsst/ap/association/diaPipe.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
The test previously used timeMethod as a proxy for determining whether
a mock was run, instead of just asking the mock. This roundabout
approach was, in effect, testing timeMethod instead of DiaPipelineTask.
This commit also includes the doConfigureApdb flag, which selects
between apdb and apdb_config_url.
The new doConfigureApdb flag is *not* deprecated, since the default is
the old behavior and pipelines are expected to override it.
The only tests that still use db_url are those specifically testing
compatibility with the old system.
Since the old unit tests used custom loaders, the migration required a
substantial rewrite. However, the database query output can now be
mocked directly.
@kfindeisen kfindeisen merged commit 719b61f into main Apr 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@kfindeisen kfindeisen deleted the tickets/DM-43416 branch April 30, 2024 20:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants