Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-42217: Incorporate ModelPackage Butler datasets into ap_verify #209

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Feb 6, 2024

Conversation

kfindeisen
Copy link
Member

@kfindeisen kfindeisen commented Jan 20, 2024

This PR removes ApVerify's definitions of rbClassify, which were added to ApPipe on lsst/ap_pipe#156. This change minimizes the degree to which ApVerify redefines the AP pipeline instead of augmenting it, fixing a bug where the classifications did not make it into the final DiaSource table (see DM-41147).


  • Do unit tests pass (scons and/or stack-os-matrix)?
  • Did you run ap_verify.py on at least one of the standard datasets?
    For changes to metrics, the print_metricvalues script from lsst.verify will be useful.
  • Is the Sphinx documentation up-to-date?

@kfindeisen
Copy link
Member Author

Sorry @rai-harshit, I overlooked a documentation change (added as aae0fff; it's a result of the data set changes rather than the move to ApPipe).

@kfindeisen
Copy link
Member Author

@rai-harshit, can you take a look at 30ccb36, since it represents significant new content on the PR?

This change makes both pipelines logically coherent, and prevents the
configuration for rbClassify or transformDiaSrcCat from being lost in
instrument specializations.
rbClassifier_data is no longer needed to use ap_verify; individual data
sets should either include the desired model themselves, or exclude the
rbClassify task from their pipeline.

This reverts commit ef2d57a.
@kfindeisen kfindeisen merged commit eb3fd0b into main Feb 6, 2024
2 checks passed
@kfindeisen kfindeisen deleted the tickets/DM-42217 branch February 6, 2024 18:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants