Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-28598: Fix pipetask command-line utility doc generation. #115

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 26, 2021

Conversation

TallJimbo
Copy link
Member

The rST content was severely bitrotted. I'm not sure what was going on with the conf.py, but sphinx couldn't find its click extensions
without this change, which is just mindless cargo-culting from daf_butler.

Copy link
Member

@timj timj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The conf.py was the old one for the old documenteer so the change to that is good.

Copy link
Member

@jonathansick jonathansick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, these changes are fine.

One bit of feedback is that the practice of putting the command-line reference directly on the module's homepage isn't consistent with our documentation design. Instead, you want each command-line reference on its own page, and link to those command-line references using a toctree in the index.rst file using the "Command line scripts" heading.

The rST content was severely bitrotted.  I'm not sure what was going
on with the conf.py, but sphinx couldn't find its click extensions
without this change, which is just mindless cargo-culting from
daf_butler.
@TallJimbo TallJimbo merged commit 2bc75c1 into master Mar 26, 2021
@TallJimbo TallJimbo deleted the tickets/DM-28598 branch March 26, 2021 15:20
@TallJimbo
Copy link
Member Author

Merging before the pipelines.lsst.io component of the ticket is complete so I can more easily test that they work together, by getting this into a daily. (@jonathansick 's requested change has been addressed, and he signed off on Jira.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants