Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-26874: rename pipetask2 to pipetask, remove old pipetask #6

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 6, 2020

Conversation

n8pease
Copy link
Contributor

@n8pease n8pease commented Oct 3, 2020

No description provided.

@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ fi
# can not be the same.
# Do not specify a number of processors (-j) to test that the default value
# works.
pipetask run -d "exposure=903342 AND detector=10" -b DATA_REPO/butler.yaml \
-i HSC/calib,HSC/raw/all,refcats --longlog \
pipetask --long-log run -d "exposure=903342 AND detector=10" -b DATA_REPO/butler.yaml \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm, I thought we are keeping all options to be per-sub-command options?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

logging was an exception to this.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm fine with that as long as there is a consensus. Initially pipetask had global options too, I'm glad we are going in circles 🙂

Copy link
Contributor

@andy-slac andy-slac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, but check my question.

@n8pease n8pease merged commit d2b40e6 into master Oct 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants