https error

[RunThem]

• Platform:

  • Linux

• LuaRocks version:

  • luarocks --version3.7

- sudo luarocks install  luaformatter

Error: LuaRocks 3.7.0 bug (please report at https://github.com/luarocks/luarocks/issues).
Arch.: linux-x86_64
/usr/share/lua/5.4/ssl/https.lua:66: bad argument #2 to 'method' (string expected, got light userdata)
stack traceback:
        [C]: in function 'socket.http.request'
        /usr/share/lua/5.4/ssl/https.lua:132: in function 'ssl.https.request'
        /usr/local/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/fs/lua.lua:729: in upvalue 'request'
        /usr/local/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/fs/lua.lua:837: in upvalue 'http_request'
        /usr/local/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/fs/lua.lua:904: in function 'luarocks.fs.lua.download'
        (...tail calls...)
        /usr/local/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/fetch.lua:154: in function 'luarocks.fetch.fetch_url'
        /usr/local/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/fetch.lua:50: in function 'luarocks.fetch.fetch_caching'
        /usr/local/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/manif.lua:108: in function 'luarocks.manif.load_manifest'
        /usr/local/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/search.lua:111: in function </usr/local/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/search.lua:101>
        (...tail calls...)
        /usr/local/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/search.lua:155: in function 'luarocks.search.search_repos'
        /usr/local/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/search.lua:241: in function 'luarocks.search.find_suitable_rock'
        /usr/local/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/search.lua:263: in function 'luarocks.search.find_rock_checking_lua_versions'
        /usr/local/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/cmd/install.lua:242: in function 'luarocks.cmd.install.command'
        (...tail calls...)
        [C]: in function 'xpcall'
        /usr/local/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/cmd.lua:663: in function 'luarocks.cmd.run_command'
        /usr/local/bin/luarocks:38: in main chunk
        [C]: in ?

Unable to download package

[hishamhm]

I believe this was an issue with luasec and Lua 5.4. Upgrading LuaSec to 1.0.2 should work. Feel free to reopen if the problem persists with the latest LuaSec.

[filipmnowak]

@hishamhm, was it really fixed in 1.0.2?

$ dpkg -l | grep lua-sec | awk '{print $2" | "$3}'
lua-sec:amd64 | 1.0.2-1

$ grep PRETTY /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS"

$ luarocks-5.4 --local install jsonschema

Error: LuaRocks 3.8.0 bug (please report at https://github.com/luarocks/luarocks/issues).
Arch.: linux-x86_64
/usr/share/lua/5.4/ssl/https.lua:66: bad argument #2 to 'method' (string expected, got light userdata)
stack traceback:
        [C]: in function 'socket.http.request'
        /usr/share/lua/5.4/ssl/https.lua:132: in function 'ssl.https.request'
        /usr/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/fs/lua.lua:729: in upvalue 'request'
        /usr/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/fs/lua.lua:837: in upvalue 'http_request'
        /usr/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/fs/lua.lua:904: in function 'luarocks.fs.lua.download'
        (...tail calls...)
        /usr/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/fetch.lua:154: in function 'luarocks.fetch.fetch_url'
        /usr/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/fetch.lua:50: in function 'luarocks.fetch.fetch_caching'
        /usr/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/manif.lua:108: in function 'luarocks.manif.load_manifest'
        /usr/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/search.lua:111: in function </usr/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/search.lua:101>
        (...tail calls...)
        /usr/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/search.lua:155: in function 'luarocks.search.search_repos'
        /usr/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/search.lua:241: in function 'luarocks.search.find_suitable_rock'
        /usr/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/search.lua:263: in function 'luarocks.search.find_rock_checking_lua_versions'
        /usr/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/cmd/install.lua:242: in function 'luarocks.cmd.install.command'
        (...tail calls...)
        [C]: in function 'xpcall'
        /usr/share/lua/5.4/luarocks/cmd.lua:666: in function 'luarocks.cmd.run_command'
        /usr/bin/luarocks:35: in main chunk
        [C]: in ?

[hishamhm]

@filipmnowak I don't know for sure, but luasec is currently at 1.2.0. I just enabled the latest luasec in our test suite, and it looks like things are working: #1434