Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⚡️ Quicker UI updates when adding participant #1045

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

lukevella
Copy link
Owner

@lukevella lukevella commented Mar 2, 2024

Avoid doing waiting for a round-trip to the server to update the UI with the new participant

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved the participant addition process in polls to ensure the participant list is accurately updated and refreshed upon new entries.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 2, 2024

Walkthrough

This update enhances the useAddParticipantMutation function, focusing on improving the handling of participant additions in polls. Specifically, it revises the onSuccess callback to efficiently incorporate a newly added participant into the current vote tally, ensuring the participant list is promptly updated and relevant data is refreshed for accuracy in real-time interactions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../poll/mutations.ts Modified onSuccess in useAddParticipantMutation to update participant list and invalidate cache.

🐇✨
In the code where bits align,
A rabbit hopped, making design refine.
With each leap and bound,
New participants were found,
In the poll, they now shine.
🌟📊

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 2, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
app ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 2, 2024 9:05am
landing ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 2, 2024 9:05am

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9d5d0a and d0f12d9.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/src/components/poll/mutations.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
apps/web/src/components/poll/mutations.ts (1)
  • 22-32: The onSuccess callback in useAddParticipantMutation correctly updates the participant list upon successfully adding a new participant. However, there are a few areas for improvement:
  • Performance: Directly mutating the existing participants array (if it were done) could lead to unintended side effects. However, the current implementation correctly creates a new array, preserving immutability.
  • Best Practices: The use of existingParticipants = [] as a default parameter ensures that the function can handle cases where existingParticipants might be undefined. This is a good defensive programming practice.
  • Correctness: The new participant is added to the beginning of the list. This is a design choice, but it's important to ensure this aligns with the UI expectations and user experience.
  • Data Integrity: Ensure that the input.votes structure matches the expected format for votes in the participant list. This is not directly verifiable from the provided code but is crucial for maintaining data consistency.

Overall, the implementation seems solid, but it's essential to keep these considerations in mind, especially regarding data integrity and UI expectations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant