Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(URGENT) Arrowheads for direct association and generalization association should be different #73

Closed
ronaldtse opened this issue Mar 10, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

ronaldtse commented Mar 10, 2021

Direct associations use a black-filled arrowhead while generalization associations use a non-filled arrowhead.

This is an important bug to fix.

e.g.

image

@ronaldtse ronaldtse added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 10, 2021
@w00lf
Copy link
Contributor

w00lf commented Mar 14, 2021

Direct associations use a black-filled arrowhead while generalization associations use a non-filled arrowhead.

This is an important bug to fix.

e.g.

image

@ronaldtse can you please provide the source of the file you mention above(lutaml)?

@w00lf
Copy link
Contributor

w00lf commented Jun 2, 2021

@ronaldtse @opoudjis fixed in lutaml/lutaml#25, released new lutaml version: 0.7.2

@opoudjis
Copy link

opoudjis commented Jun 2, 2021

Confirmed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants