We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Direct associations use a black-filled arrowhead while generalization associations use a non-filled arrowhead.
This is an important bug to fix.
e.g.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Direct associations use a black-filled arrowhead while generalization associations use a non-filled arrowhead. This is an important bug to fix. e.g.
@ronaldtse can you please provide the source of the file you mention above(lutaml)?
Sorry, something went wrong.
That file is https://github.com/metanorma/metanorma-model-bipm/blob/master/models/BipmStandardDocument.wsd , but it's raw PlantUML. For an example of a file failing, see https://github.com/metanorma/metanorma-model-bsi/blob/main/images/BsiStandardDocument.png , generated from https://github.com/metanorma/metanorma-model-bsi/blob/main/views/BsiStandardDocument.lutaml
lutaml/lutaml-uml#73 fix wrong direct display
84bd418
@ronaldtse @opoudjis fixed in lutaml/lutaml#25, released new lutaml version: 0.7.2
Confirmed
w00lf
No branches or pull requests
Direct associations use a black-filled arrowhead while generalization associations use a non-filled arrowhead.
This is an important bug to fix.
e.g.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: