Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libomp: Disable universal on Mojave+ #2661

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2018

Conversation

eborisch
Copy link
Member

Can't recall if this route (switching a portgroup on and off) is kosher, but that's what review is for, right?

Trying to address https://trac.macports.org/ticket/56720 sooner than waiting for a new port update since libomp is a dependency for many (via the clangs) ports.

@macportsbot macportsbot added by: member Created by a member with commit rights maintainer maintainer: open Affects an openmaintainer port labels Sep 28, 2018
@macportsbot
Copy link

Travis Build #3746 Passed.

Lint results
--->  Verifying Portfile for libomp
--->  0 errors and 0 warnings found.

Port libomp success on xcode9.4. Log
Port libomp-devel success on xcode9.4. Log
Port libomp success on xcode8.3. Log
Port libomp-devel success on xcode8.3. Log
Port libomp success on xcode7.3. Log
Port libomp-devel success on xcode7.3. Log
Port libomp success on xcode10. Log

@eborisch
Copy link
Member Author

Travis is showing I haven't broken Pre-Mojave, so pulling the trigger. I don't have a Mojave system yet, see https://trac.macports.org/ticket/56720 for feedback from users. (Hopefully.)

@eborisch eborisch merged commit 06df52a into macports:master Sep 28, 2018
@eborisch eborisch deleted the libomp-mojave branch September 28, 2018 01:20
@pmetzger
Copy link
Member

I think this was the right thing to do. (I've also tested it, and it works.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
by: member Created by a member with commit rights maintainer: open Affects an openmaintainer port maintainer
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants