Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Issue] MFTF: Remove risky test that does not have implementation #28850

Closed
4 tasks
m2-assistant bot opened this issue Jun 23, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #28605
Closed
4 tasks

[Issue] MFTF: Remove risky test that does not have implementation #28850

m2-assistant bot opened this issue Jun 23, 2020 · 3 comments · Fixed by #28605
Assignees
Labels
Component: AdminAnalytics Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Priority: P4 No current plan to fix. Fixing can be deferred as a logical part of more important work. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S4 Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”.

Comments

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Jun 23, 2020

This issue is automatically created based on existing pull request: #28605: MFTF: Remove risky test that does not have implementation


Description (*)

I am removing test that does not have implementation.
That kind of tests are considered Risky as these does not test anything, but give false assumption that feature is covered with tests.

Expected behavior (*)

Benefits

Additional information

Contribution checklist (*)

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds are green)
@m2-assistant m2-assistant bot added Component: AdminAnalytics Priority: P4 No current plan to fix. Fixing can be deferred as a logical part of more important work. Severity: S4 Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”. labels Jun 23, 2020
@ghost ghost assigned lbajsarowicz Jun 23, 2020
@ghost ghost added this to Ready for QA in Community Backlog Jun 23, 2020
@ghost ghost moved this from Ready for QA to PR In Progress in Community Backlog Jun 23, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Issue: Format is not valid Gate 1 Failed. Automatic verification of issue format is failed label Jun 23, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed and removed Issue: Format is not valid Gate 1 Failed. Automatic verification of issue format is failed labels Jun 23, 2020
@engcom-Delta engcom-Delta self-assigned this Jun 23, 2020
@m2-assistant
Copy link
Author

m2-assistant bot commented Jun 23, 2020

Hi @engcom-Delta. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

  • 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).

    DetailsIf the issue has a valid description, the label Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.

  • 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.

  • 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.

  • 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch

    Details- Add the comment @magento give me 2.4-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!

  • 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.

  • 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

@engcom-Delta engcom-Delta added Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed labels Jun 23, 2020
@ghost ghost unassigned engcom-Delta Jun 23, 2020
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Confirmed by @engcom-Delta
Thank you for verifying the issue. Based on the provided information internal tickets MC-35380 were created

Issue Available: @engcom-Delta, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch labels Jun 23, 2020
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @m2-assistant[bot]. Thank you for your report.
The issue has been fixed in #28605 by @lbajsarowicz in 2.4-develop branch
Related commit(s):

The fix will be available with the upcoming 2.4.1 release.

@ghost ghost moved this from PR In Progress to Done (last 30 days) in Community Backlog Jun 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: AdminAnalytics Fixed in 2.4.x The issue has been fixed in 2.4-develop branch Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Priority: P4 No current plan to fix. Fixing can be deferred as a logical part of more important work. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S4 Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”.
Projects
No open projects
Community Backlog
  
Done (last 30 days)
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants