Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attribute is returned as aggregation in products query even if Use in Search Results Layered Navigation is set to no #33318

Closed
1 of 5 tasks
oneserv-heuser opened this issue Jun 22, 2021 · 16 comments
Labels
Area: APIs Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Priority: P1 Once P0 defects have been fixed, a defect having this priority is the next candidate for fixing. Progress: done Project: GraphQL Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S1 Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.

Comments

@oneserv-heuser
Copy link

oneserv-heuser commented Jun 22, 2021

Preconditions (*)

  1. Magento 2.4.2

Steps to reproduce (*)

  1. On any attribute set the setting "Use in Search Results Layered Navigation" to no (using price as example here)
  2. Execute the following graphql query:
query searchProducts {
    products(search: "") {
        aggregations {
            label
        }
    }
}

Expected result (*)

image

Actual result (*)

image

Whats the problem about it (*)

The huge problem is here that if you build filters based on the aggregation field the user will be able to filter the price. But if you try to filter via the price if it's disabled for layered navigation you'll receive the following error:
image


Please provide Severity assessment for the Issue as Reporter. This information will help during Confirmation and Issue triage processes.

  • Severity: S0 - Affects critical data or functionality and leaves users without workaround.
  • Severity: S1 - Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
  • Severity: S2 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
  • Severity: S3 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround.
  • Severity: S4 - Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”.
@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Jun 22, 2021

Hi @oneserv-heuser. Thank you for your report.
To help us process this issue please make sure that you provided the following information:

  • Summary of the issue
  • Information on your environment
  • Steps to reproduce
  • Expected and actual results

Please make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce. To deploy vanilla Magento instance on our environment, please, add a comment to the issue:

@magento give me 2.4-develop instance - upcoming 2.4.x release

For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation.

Please, add a comment to assign the issue: @magento I am working on this


⚠️ According to the Magento Contribution requirements, all issues must go through the Community Contributions Triage process. Community Contributions Triage is a public meeting.

🕙 You can find the schedule on the Magento Community Calendar page.

📞 The triage of issues happens in the queue order. If you want to speed up the delivery of your contribution, please join the Community Contributions Triage session to discuss the appropriate ticket.

🎥 You can find the recording of the previous Community Contributions Triage on the Magento Youtube Channel

✏️ Feel free to post questions/proposals/feedback related to the Community Contributions Triage process to the corresponding Slack Channel

@oneserv-heuser
Copy link
Author

@magento give me 2.4-develop instance

@magento-deployment-service
Copy link

Hi @oneserv-heuser. Thank you for your request. I'm working on Magento instance for you.

@oneserv-heuser
Copy link
Author

@magento I can confirm that this issue is reproducible on the vanilla magento instance

@oneserv-heuser
Copy link
Author

I just found out that this issue not only exists for the price attribute but for all attributes. Magento ignores the settings in the backend. If you set the setting "Use in Search Results Layered Navigation" to false then the attribute gets returned when asking for the aggregation field but you cannot use it in the field ProdutAttributeFilterInput.

@oneserv-heuser oneserv-heuser changed the title Price is returned as aggregation in products query even if use in search is set to no Attribute is returned as aggregation in products query even if Use in Search Results Layered Navigation is set to no Jun 23, 2021
@khrystynastolbova
Copy link
Contributor

@magento I am working on this

@khrystynastolbova
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @oneserv-heuser.
I tested, and Magento really ignores the settings in the backend of the "price" field, but I have no problems with other attributes.

The settings for the "price", "visibility", "category_ids" fields are specifically ignored (in file CatalogGraphQl/Plugin/Search/Request/ConfigReader.php)

/**
     * Generate search request for search products via GraphQL
     *
     * @return array
     * @SuppressWarnings(PHPMD.CyclomaticComplexity)
     */
    private function generateRequest()
    {
        $request = [];
        foreach ($this->getSearchableAttributes() as $attribute) {
            if (\in_array($attribute->getAttributeCode(), ['price', 'visibility', 'category_ids'])) {
                //some fields have special semantics
                continue;
            }
           ...

The price is added separately in the file CatalogGraphQl/etc/graphql/di.xml

    <type name="Magento\CatalogGraphQl\DataProvider\Product\LayeredNavigation\LayerBuilder">
        <arguments>
            <argument name="builders" xsi:type="array">
                <item name="price_bucket" xsi:type="object">Magento\CatalogGraphQl\DataProvider\Product\LayeredNavigation\Builder\Price</item>
                <item name="category_bucket" xsi:type="object">Magento\CatalogGraphQl\DataProvider\Product\LayeredNavigation\Builder\Category</item>
                <item name="attribute_bucket" xsi:type="object">Magento\CatalogGraphQl\DataProvider\Product\LayeredNavigation\Builder\Attribute</item>
            </argument>
        </arguments>
    </type>

@oneserv-heuser
Copy link
Author

@khrystynastolbova You're right, it only affects those attributes. I tried it again and my custom attributes are not returned. Maybe that was something cache related back then.

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Dec 9, 2021

Hi @engcom-Hotel. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

  • 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).

    DetailsIf the issue has a valid description, the label Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.

  • 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.

  • 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.

  • 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch

    Details- Add the comment @magento give me 2.4-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!

  • 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.

  • 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

@engcom-Hotel
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @oneserv-heuser,

Thank you for informing the issue.

The issue is verified and is reproducible on Magento 2.4-develop.

Navigated to Stores->Attributes->Product and I changed ‘Use in Layered Navigation’ to ‘No’ for ‘Price’ Attribute. Below a screenshot of the same:
image
I tried to run GraphQL product search query but ‘Price’ is still coming in ‘aggregations’ as below:
image
Magento is ignoring the ‘Price’ and some other settings which are set in Admin Panel. So that is why putting the issue as Confirmed.

Thanks,

@engcom-Hotel engcom-Hotel added Area: APIs Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed labels Dec 9, 2021
@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot moved this from Ready for Confirmation to Confirmed in Issue Confirmation and Triage Board Dec 9, 2021
@github-jira-sync-bot
Copy link

✅ Jira issue https://jira.corp.magento.com/browse/AC-1955 is successfully created for this GitHub issue.

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Dec 9, 2021

✅ Confirmed by @engcom-Hotel. Thank you for verifying the issue.
Issue Available: @engcom-Hotel, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.

@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot moved this from Ready for Development to Pull Request In Progress in High Priority Backlog Feb 25, 2022
@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot moved this from Ready for Development to Pull Request In Progress in High Priority Backlog Feb 25, 2022
@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot moved this from Pull Request In Progress to Ready for Development in High Priority Backlog Mar 14, 2022
@cpartica cpartica moved this from Ready for Development to Good first Issue in High Priority Backlog Mar 14, 2022
@cpartica cpartica moved this from Good first Issue to Ready for Development in High Priority Backlog Mar 14, 2022
@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot moved this from Ready for Development to Good first Issue in High Priority Backlog Mar 14, 2022
@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot moved this from Good first Issue to Ready for Development in High Priority Backlog Mar 14, 2022
@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot moved this from Ready for Development to Pull Request In Progress in High Priority Backlog Mar 14, 2022
@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot moved this from Pull Request In Progress to Dev In Progress in High Priority Backlog Mar 21, 2022
@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot moved this from Dev In Progress to Pull Request In Progress in High Priority Backlog Mar 23, 2022
@engcom-Alfa
Copy link
Contributor

engcom-Alfa commented Apr 22, 2022

Hi @oneserv-heuser ,
Thanks for your reported bug, the internal team has fixed and delivered this issue successfully.
Please find related commits HERE.

Kindly upgrade to the latest Magento version 2.4-develop to retest the case.

In case of any Magento related issues found in 2.4-develop, you may report a new bug with all the information like Preconditions, detailed steps to reproduce, expected and actual Results along with screenshots/ screen recordings.

For any Magento related references, you may refer to the Magento user guide.

Thanks!

@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot moved this from Pull Request In Progress to Done in High Priority Backlog Apr 22, 2022
@joggienl
Copy link

Hopefully someone can respond to this question because I am confused.

Which one of the following settings should be affected by this issue?

image

The issue seems to be talking about both of them.

Thanks!

@oneserv-heuser
Copy link
Author

@joggienl The "Use in Layered Navigation" setting should be affected by this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: APIs Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Priority: P1 Once P0 defects have been fixed, a defect having this priority is the next candidate for fixing. Progress: done Project: GraphQL Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S1 Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants