Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

SaveWithBlock and SaveWithBlockAndWait are the same #349

Closed
blackgold9 opened this issue Dec 21, 2012 · 2 comments
Closed

SaveWithBlock and SaveWithBlockAndWait are the same #349

blackgold9 opened this issue Dec 21, 2012 · 2 comments
Assignees
@tonyarnold
Labels
Bug
Milestone
2.1.0

Comments

@blackgold9
Copy link
Contributor

SaveWithblock just calls SaveWithBlockAndWait.
I would expect saveWithBlock to be asynchronous with an "andWait" variant also present.
@ghost ghost assigned tonyarnold Dec 21, 2012
@tonyarnold
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, I missed this one (or had a brain fart when I was building it). It'll be fixed for release.

@tonyarnold
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed by 357b62e

madninja pushed a commit to madninja/MagicalRecord that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2013
@tonyarnold
Alter saveWithBlock: so that it runs asynchronously. Fixes magicalpan…
357b62e 
…da#349.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@tonyarnold tonyarnold

Labels
Bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.1.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@tonyarnold @blackgold9