Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

All Option Descriptions Should Be Extensible #27

Closed
seandenigris opened this issue Oct 7, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

All Option Descriptions Should Be Extensible #27

seandenigris opened this issue Oct 7, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@seandenigris
Copy link
Member

Right now, only Single Option Descriptions allow you to add a new object not included in the initial options, but there doesn't seem to be anything specific to the Single-Option domain.
@seandenigris
Copy link
Member Author

Committed Magritte-Model-SeanDeNigris.466

Now MultipleOptionDescriptions can be #extensible, too!

Implementation note: #initializer had to be pushed up, since we need to supply a way to create the new instance. This pushes us a bit closer to my suspicion that #classes for reference descriptions should be #factories, which would probably mean a name-change for #initializer

seandenigris pushed a commit to seandenigris/Magritte that referenced this issue Jul 27, 2016
Magritte-Model-SeanDeNigris.466: [Enh]: Fix Issue magritte-metamodel#27…
09bd69d 
…: All Option Descriptions Should Be Extensible; now MultipleOptionDescriptions can be #extensible, too! Implementation note: #initializer had to be pushed up, since we need to supply a way to create the new instance. This pushes us a bit closer to my suspicion that #classes for reference descriptions should be #factories, which would probably mean a name-change for #initializer
noha pushed a commit to zweidenker/magritte that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2018
@seandenigris @noha
[Enh]: Fix Issue magritte-metamodel#27: All Option Descriptions Shoul…
039957b 
…d Be Extensible; now MultipleOptionDescriptions can be #extensible, too!

Implementation note: #initializer had to be pushed up, since we need to supply a way to create the new instance. This pushes us a bit closer to my suspicion that #classes for reference descriptions should be #factories, which would probably mean a name-change for #initializer
@seandenigris seandenigris reopened this Aug 15, 2018
@seandenigris
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed by 039957b

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@seandenigris