Guesses implied command from three filenames, by which doesn't exist #11
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When provided three arguments, and the first isn't a valid command, CLI assumes diff when the patch file doesn't exist OR patch when the new file doesn't exist.
Nzen
changed the title
|
Ha, cool idea. I'll merge it. Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scenario : I supplied the three filenames, but forgot to include the command. However, if either the new file or the diff file is missing on disc, that's enough information that jbsdiff can create that file by patching or diffing, respectively.
This version does so, provided the first argument isn't the word diff or patch. It announces its guess (as a reminder) but does not rely on confirmation.