Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG FIX: Fix test_bounce_animation #99

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2018
Merged

BUG FIX: Fix test_bounce_animation #99

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2018

Conversation

eoinnoble
Copy link
Contributor

Description of new feature, or changes

When I ran my initial tox the test_bounce_animation test was
failing for me because it seemed to assume that my console would
be 80 characters wide, which it was not. I used your existing
get_terminal_columns function to remove the assumption, and now
the test should pass regardless of the width of the tester's
console.

I also fixed a typo.

Checklist

  • Your branch is up-to-date with the base branch
  • You've included at least one test if this is a new feature
  • All tests are passing (I was only able to run the py36 tests)

Related Issues and Discussions

This fixes an issue raised in #78.

People to notify

@manrajgrover @otivvormes

When I ran my initial tox the `test_bounce_animation` test was
failing for me because it seemed to assume that my console would
be 80 characters wide, which it was not. I used your existing
`get_terminal_columns` function to remove the assumption, and now
the test should pass regardless of the width of the tester's
console.

I also fixed a typo.
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 14, 2018

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 286

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.6%) to 92.157%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 285: 0.6%
Covered Lines: 272
Relevant Lines: 289

💛 - Coveralls

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 286

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.6%) to 92.157%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 285: 0.6%
Covered Lines: 272
Relevant Lines: 289

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Oct 14, 2018

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 286

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.6%) to 92.157%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 285: 0.6%
Covered Lines: 272
Relevant Lines: 289

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Owner

@manrajgrover manrajgrover left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@eoinnoble LGTM! 💯 Thanks for looking into it and fixing. I think this was raised recently here.

@manrajgrover manrajgrover merged commit 617032f into manrajgrover:master Oct 20, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants