Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PostGIS vectors reduction, XML parameter driven (#1136) #1179

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 19, 2012

Conversation

strk
Copy link
Contributor

@strk strk commented Apr 17, 2012

Master version of #1147

@springmeyer
Copy link
Member

great, looks good. Can you add basic docs (and perhaps a link to your blog post) at https://github.com/mapnik/mapnik/wiki/PostGIS ? After that I will merge. For the docs you can say this will be available in Mapnik >= 2.1.0.

@strk
Copy link
Contributor Author

strk commented Apr 18, 2012

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 06:22:40PM -0700, Dane Springmeyer wrote:

great, looks good. Can you add basic docs (and perhaps a link to your blog post) at https://github.com/mapnik/mapnik/wiki/PostGIS ? After that I will merge. For the docs you can say this will be available in Mapnik >= 2.1.0.

Done.
I've also taken the chance to spell-check (since the browser prompted)
https://github.com/mapnik/mapnik/wiki/PostGIS/_compare/b1c8c014827430fd4d8021c556eb922eb27f4918%5E...b1c8c014827430fd4d8021c556eb922eb27f4918

--Strk;

,------o-.
| __/ | Delivering high quality PostGIS 2.0 !
| / 2.0 | http://strk.keybit.net - http://vizzuality.com
`-o------'

@springmeyer
Copy link
Member

excellent, thanks for the wiki edit. merging now!

springmeyer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2012
PostGIS vectors reduction, XML parameter driven (#1136)
@springmeyer springmeyer merged commit cfc0866 into mapnik:master Apr 19, 2012
springmeyer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2012
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants