-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do not serve account actors at all in limited federation mode #14800
Merged
Gargron
merged 2 commits into
mastodon:master
from
ClearlyClaire:fixes/authorized-fetch-mode-reject-fetches
Sep 14, 2020
Merged
Do not serve account actors at all in limited federation mode #14800
Gargron
merged 2 commits into
mastodon:master
from
ClearlyClaire:fixes/authorized-fetch-mode-reject-fetches
Sep 14, 2020
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When an account is fetched without a signature from an allowed instance, return an error. This isn't really an improvement in security, as the only information that was previously returned was required protocol-level info, and the only personal bit was the existence of the account. The existence of the account can still be checked by issuing a webfinger query, as those are accepted without signatures. However, this change makes it so that unallowed instances won't create account records on their end when they find a reference to an unknown account. The previous behavior of rendering a limited list of fields, instead of not rendering the actor at all, was in order to prevent situations in which two instances in Authorized Fetch mode or Limited Federation mode would fail to reach each other because resolving an account would require a signed query… from an account which can only be fetched with a signed query itself. However, this should now be fine as fetching accounts is done by signing on behalf of the special instance actor, which does not require any kind of valid signature to be fetched.
Gargron
approved these changes
Sep 14, 2020
61debe3
to
df90c4d
Compare
thenameisnigel-old
pushed a commit
to ChatterlyOSE/Chatterly
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2020
…on#14800) * Do not serve account actors at all in limited federation mode When an account is fetched without a signature from an allowed instance, return an error. This isn't really an improvement in security, as the only information that was previously returned was required protocol-level info, and the only personal bit was the existence of the account. The existence of the account can still be checked by issuing a webfinger query, as those are accepted without signatures. However, this change makes it so that unallowed instances won't create account records on their end when they find a reference to an unknown account. The previous behavior of rendering a limited list of fields, instead of not rendering the actor at all, was in order to prevent situations in which two instances in Authorized Fetch mode or Limited Federation mode would fail to reach each other because resolving an account would require a signed query… from an account which can only be fetched with a signed query itself. However, this should now be fine as fetching accounts is done by signing on behalf of the special instance actor, which does not require any kind of valid signature to be fetched. * Fix tests
Gargron
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2020
* Do not serve account actors at all in limited federation mode When an account is fetched without a signature from an allowed instance, return an error. This isn't really an improvement in security, as the only information that was previously returned was required protocol-level info, and the only personal bit was the existence of the account. The existence of the account can still be checked by issuing a webfinger query, as those are accepted without signatures. However, this change makes it so that unallowed instances won't create account records on their end when they find a reference to an unknown account. The previous behavior of rendering a limited list of fields, instead of not rendering the actor at all, was in order to prevent situations in which two instances in Authorized Fetch mode or Limited Federation mode would fail to reach each other because resolving an account would require a signed query… from an account which can only be fetched with a signed query itself. However, this should now be fine as fetching accounts is done by signing on behalf of the special instance actor, which does not require any kind of valid signature to be fetched. * Fix tests
shouo1987
pushed a commit
to CrossGate-Pawoo/mastodon
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2022
…on#14800) * Do not serve account actors at all in limited federation mode When an account is fetched without a signature from an allowed instance, return an error. This isn't really an improvement in security, as the only information that was previously returned was required protocol-level info, and the only personal bit was the existence of the account. The existence of the account can still be checked by issuing a webfinger query, as those are accepted without signatures. However, this change makes it so that unallowed instances won't create account records on their end when they find a reference to an unknown account. The previous behavior of rendering a limited list of fields, instead of not rendering the actor at all, was in order to prevent situations in which two instances in Authorized Fetch mode or Limited Federation mode would fail to reach each other because resolving an account would require a signed query… from an account which can only be fetched with a signed query itself. However, this should now be fine as fetching accounts is done by signing on behalf of the special instance actor, which does not require any kind of valid signature to be fetched. * Fix tests
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When an account is fetched without a signature from an allowed instance, return an error.
This isn't really an improvement in security, as the only information that was previously returned was required protocol-level info, and the only personal bit was the existence of the account. The existence of the account can still be checked by issuing a webfinger query, as those are accepted without signatures.
However, this change makes it so that unallowed instances won't create account records on their end when they find a reference to an unknown account.
The previous behavior of rendering a limited list of fields, instead of not rendering the actor at all, was in order to prevent situations in which two instances in Authorized Fetch mode or Limited Federation mode would fail to reach each other because resolving an account would require a signed query… from an account which can only be fetched with a signed query itself. However, this should now be fine as fetching accounts is done by signing on behalf of the special instance actor, which does not require any kind of valid signature to be fetched.