Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Syntax Highlight improvements #4

Closed
Kail0 opened this issue Jun 3, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Syntax Highlight improvements #4

Kail0 opened this issue Jun 3, 2015 · 5 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@Kail0
Copy link

Kail0 commented Jun 3, 2015

I guess, it's a matter of taste, but I would prefer more distinctive lines.. just a opinion, don't take me bad, sir.

@UsainBloot
Copy link

If any changes were added to the line highlighting, it would be nice to see these changes reflect the line number highlighting.

@equinusocio
Copy link
Member

I remember that this theme is in beta development. No color schemes aren't yet defined. :)

@Kail0
Copy link
Author

Kail0 commented Jun 3, 2015

Exactly, it's a beta. That's why is feedback so important, sir...

@equinusocio
Copy link
Member

Yes, but at the moment the syntax highlight aren't yet implemented. So, i've read the suggest and thanks, i'll consider it. You preferer if the issue still opened? OK, i will rename it.

@equinusocio equinusocio reopened this Jun 3, 2015
@equinusocio equinusocio changed the title Highlighting line could be more noticeable. Syntax Highlight improvements Jun 3, 2015
@equinusocio equinusocio added this to the v1.0.0 Stable milestone Jun 3, 2015
@equinusocio equinusocio self-assigned this Jun 3, 2015
@Kail0
Copy link
Author

Kail0 commented Jun 3, 2015

Naah, it's up to you, sir. I don't want to be pain in the a-hole.
You are doing your job and I really appreciate it your effort. Really good looking theme, I'm in love.

have a nice day! (=

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants